Skip to main content
CivicGate

← People

Becca Balint

Becca Balint

Democratic · VT U.S. RepresentativeCandidate 2026

Service history

4 years in the U.S. Congress · since 2023

  • Representative VT 2023–present

Background

  • background Born May 4, 1968 in Heidelberg, West Germany; raised in Peekskill, New York
  • background Educated at Smith College, Harvard University, and the University of Massachusetts Amherst; worked as a teacher and columnist
  • role A Democrat who served in the Vermont Senate (2015-2023), as majority leader (2017-2021) and president pro tempore (2021-2023)
  • achievement First openly lesbian member of the Vermont Senate and first woman and openly LGBTQ person to serve as its president pro tempore
  • role Member of the U.S. House for Vermont's at-large district since the 2022 election
  • achievement First woman and first openly LGBTQ person to represent Vermont in Congress

Campaign finance

2024 cycle

Incumbent for U.S. House VT-00 · 2026 General Election

  • $1,394,864 raised
  • $1,280,659 spent
  • $145,761 cash on hand
$1.39M
$1.39M
$1.02M
Itemized (≥ $200)$805.42K
Unitemized (< $200)$214.12K
Party committees$276.24
Other committees (PACs)$365.63K
Transfers from other committees$5.00K
Offsets to expenditures$3.36K
Other receipts$1.06K
$1.28M
Operating expenditures$1.09M
Contribution refunds$18.87K
Other disbursements$170.46K
Cash on hand$145.76K
Debts owed by committee$0.00

Through December 31, 2024 · FEC

Data from FEC (through Dec 31, 2024)

Finance updated: Jul 23, 2026

Over time

Data from FEC per-cycle campaign finance

Money raised, spent, and cash on hand across every election cycle on record — toggle a series in the legend.

Becca Balint campaign finance by election cycle
Cycle RaisedSpentCash on hand
2022$1,898,996$1,867,440$31,556
2024$1,394,864$1,280,659$145,761
2026$911,064$458,178$598,648

Track record

Assembled from Congress.gov · FEC · official disclosures — each fact links its own source

These are verifiable facts from the public record, assembled in one place and presented without judgment. They are not a score, a grade, or a ranking. Context matters: a missed vote may be excused, on leadership or committee duty, or paired; a party-unity rate reflects agenda alignment, not virtue or independence; a disclosed trade or a documented relationship is a required public filing, not evidence of wrongdoing. Each fact links to its full source below.

  • 98.5%
    Roll-call participation →

    voted in 619 recorded roll calls · chamber median 100.0%

    Missing a vote is not inherently negative — an absence can be excused, reflect leadership or committee duty, or a recorded pairing.

  • 23
    Bills sponsored →

    plus 401 cosponsored

    A count of bills introduced as the primary sponsor; most legislation never advances, regardless of who sponsors it.

  • 0
    Sponsored bills enacted →

    of 23 bills sponsored

    Whether a bill becomes law depends on the whole Congress, not the sponsor alone; substantive provisions often pass folded into other vehicles.

  • 100%
    Party-unity voting →

    votes with the party majority · median 99% · on 436 party-line votes

    Party-unity is how often a member votes with their own party's majority on party-line votes — it reflects agenda alignment, not loyalty, independence, or virtue.

  • 0%
    Cross-party voting →

    votes with the other party's majority on those same votes

    The share of the same party-line votes cast with the OTHER party's majority — a descriptive rate, not a measure of principle.

  • 0
    Documented positions →

    no positions documented yet

    Documented, sourced positions we have on record — the absence of a documented position is not the absence of a view.

  • 4
    Committee assignments →

    committees and subcommittees

    Committee seats are assignments made by party leadership — a measure of role and jurisdiction, not an achievement or a conflict in itself.

  • 1
    Documented relationships →

    neutral overlap signals (e.g., committee oversight of a traded sector)

    A documented relationship is a factual overlap in the public record — NOT evidence of wrongdoing.

Assembled from CivicGate's ingested public records for Becca Balint. A fact shown as “—” means we don't yet hold that data — not that the value is zero.

Voting record

Data from Congress.gov roll-call records

98.5%
of House roll calls voted House median 100.0% · −1.5 pts below median

Full voting record (619 roll calls) → · Congress 119 · based on 619 of 645 recorded roll calls

See the participation leaderboard →

Committee assignments (4)

Industry PAC support

Data from FEC — PAC (political action committee) contributions, 2026/2024/2022 cycles

Total disclosed PAC money: $852,417. Industry is approximated from a curated map; individual (non-PAC) donations are listed separately above.

Top PAC contributors (10)
  • AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE PAC (AAJ PAC) $26,000
  • AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION $25,000
  • EQUALITY PAC $22,500
  • ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN $18,000
  • INT'L SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION PAC $17,500
  • NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION PAC $16,000
  • REALTORS PAC $15,000
  • PAC TO THE FUTURE $15,000
  • EQUALITY PROJECT $15,000
  • MACHINISTS NON-PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE $15,000

Top contributors (FEC)

Data from FEC, itemized campaign receipts

Top contributors — 2024 cycle

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor's reported employer (FEC Schedule A).

  • NULL $14,775
  • STATE OF VERMONT $10,516
  • INVARIANT $10,400
  • GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS $6,817
  • BEACHWOLD $5,600
  • MUNOZ & CO $3,800
  • PARTNERSHIP FUND FOR NEW YORK CITY $3,800
  • MONUMENT ADVOCACY $3,750
  • ALSOP LOUIE PARTNERS, LLC $3,300
  • CATALYST $3,300

Outside spending on this race

Data from FEC, Schedule E independent expenditures

Independent expenditures are money outside groups (PACs / super-PACs) spend to support or oppose a candidate without coordinating with their campaign. What's this? →

  • 2026 cycle $10 supporting · $0 opposing · 1 outside group
  • 2024 cycle $159,774 supporting · $0 opposing · 3 outside groups

See the outside-money leaderboard →

Issue positions (15)

Documented + CivicGate vote-derived — stated positions link their source; derived positions come from votes on direction-tagged bills

Stock trades (STOCK Act)

Data from Stock Watcher / official disclosures

Loading stock trades…

Documented relationships

Documented facts about Balint, aggregated from public records. A documented relationship is not evidence of wrongdoing — it is context, not a conclusion.

  • Committee oversight & campaign money — technology coverage: medium

    Sits on the House Committee on the Judiciary, which oversees the technology sector, and received 2 PAC contributions from technology-sector political action committees totaling $2,500 (recent cycles).

    PAC industry is approximated from a curated keyword map, and only members with an FEC candidate id on file are covered — real totals may be higher.

    FEC PAC contributions

Have a question about this? Ask Balint to explain → Browse all documented relationships →

Frequent co-sponsors

Data from Congress.gov

The members Balint most often co-sponsors bills with — their legislative coalition.

Loading co-sponsors…

Connections network

Data from Congress.gov · FEC

How Balint connects to other members, committees, and PACs — drawn only from ingested records.

Loading connections…

Sponsored / cosponsored bills (200)

Data from Congress.gov

200
Page 1 of 8 · 200 bills
  • HR 9948Addictive Design Act of 2026sponsoredJul 26, 2026
  • HR 9946To require the coverage of testing for certain sexually transmitted infections without the imposition of cost sharing, and for other purposes.cosponsoredJul 22, 2026
  • HR 9799Online Sellers’ Bill of Rights Act of 2026sponsoredJul 20, 2026
  • HJRES 203Directing the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and report on anticompetitive practices and violations of the antitrust laws in the fire truck manufacturing industry.sponsoredJul 20, 2026
  • HR 9744Family Grocery and Farmer Relief ActcosponsoredJul 15, 2026
  • HR 9688High Court Gift Ban ActcosponsoredJul 13, 2026
  • HR 9572BUFFER ActsponsoredJul 1, 2026
  • HR 9540Community Housing Act of 2026sponsoredJun 29, 2026
  • HR 9544Save MEDICARE Act of 2026cosponsoredJun 29, 2026
  • HR 9432LIFT the BAR ActcosponsoredJun 23, 2026
  • HRES 1375Reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.cosponsoredJun 17, 2026
  • HR 9289Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act of 2026cosponsoredJun 10, 2026
  • HR 9281DASH ActcosponsoredJun 10, 2026
  • HR 9250Great American Outdoors Act 250cosponsoredJun 9, 2026
  • HR 9226Connecticut River Watershed Partnership ActcosponsoredJun 8, 2026
  • HRES 1342Expressing support for the designation of June 5, 2026, as "National Gun Violence Awareness Day" and June 2026 as "National Gun Violence Awareness Month".cosponsoredJun 3, 2026
  • HRES 1329Expressing support for the designation of May 2026 as "Mental Health Awareness Month".cosponsoredMay 28, 2026
  • HR 8952Elder Pride Act of 2026cosponsoredMay 20, 2026
  • HJRES 189Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "Reimagining and Improving Student Education-Federal Student Loan Program Final Regulations".cosponsoredMay 20, 2026
  • HR 8967Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program ReauthorizationcosponsoredMay 20, 2026
  • HR 8914No Taxpayer-Funded Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2026cosponsoredMay 19, 2026
  • HR 8915NO FAKES Act of 2026cosponsoredMay 19, 2026
  • HRES 1286Calling for a trade policy that supports workers, consumers, independent farmers, small businesses, and the environment.cosponsoredMay 13, 2026
  • HR 8831Protecting Our Democracy ActcosponsoredMay 13, 2026
  • HRES 1285Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that over 25 years of real-world evidence and hundreds of peer-reviewed studies proving that mifepristone is safe and effective should be respected, and law and policy governing access to lifesaving, time-sensitive medication abortion care in the United States should be equitable, transparent, and based on the best available peer-reviewed evidence-based science.cosponsoredMay 13, 2026
Page 1 of 8 · 200 bills

Comparison lens (E18)

Loading comparison vector…

Committee activity

Committee votes cast

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…