S 1090 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Restraining Judicial Insurrectionist Act of 2025
To amend section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, to establish special procedures for civil actions seeking to restrain executive branch actions.
Summary
This bill expands the use of three-judge federal district courts to lawsuits seeking to block or overturn executive branch actions or executive orders. When such a case is filed, the Chief Justice of the United States must randomly select three judges from all active federal judges nationwide (including at least one circuit judge from different circuits where possible) to hear the case. The bill requires that a majority of the three-judge panel must approve any temporary restraining order, stay, or injunction against executive action. No single judge may serve as a master, appoint a magistrate judge, or make decisions about preliminary or permanent relief in such cases—the full panel must decide.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT] (R-UT)
1 cosponsor
- Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH] (R-OH)
Actions (2)
- Mar 24, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. · senate
- Mar 24, 2025 Introduced in Senate
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 24, 2025
Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, to establish special procedures for civil actions seeking to restrain executive branch actions.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Restraining Judicial Insurrectionist Act of 2025”.
SEC. 2. SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL ACTIONS SEEKING TO RESTRAIN EXECUTIVE BRANCH ACTIONS.
Section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by inserting “In General.—” before “A district court”;
(B) by striking “shall be convened when otherwise required” and inserting the following: “shall be convened when—
“(1) otherwise required”; and
(C) by striking “Congress, or when an action” and inserting the following: “Congress;
“(2) an action is commenced against any department or office of the executive branch that seeks declaratory relief, a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, vacatur, a stay, or other equitable relief against an action of the executive branch or executive order of the President; or
“(3) an action”;
(2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph
(1), by striking “In any action” and inserting “Procedures Generally.—Except as provided in subsection (c), in any action”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Procedures for Actions Seeking To Restrain Executive Branch Actions.—
“(1) Selection of judges for a three-judge district court.—
“(A) In general.—Upon the filing of a request for three judges in an action described in subsection
(a)(2), the judge to whom the request is made shall, unless the judge determines that three judges are not required, immediately notify the Chief Justice of the United States, who shall designate three judges at random from a list of all judges in active service regardless of circuit—
“(i) one of whom shall be a circuit judge in active service; and
“(ii) not more than two of whom may be serving in the same judicial circuit.
“(B) Service by judge receiving request.—The judge to whom a request described in subparagraph (A) was presented may serve as a member of the district court to hear and determine the action if—
“(i) the judge is selected to be a member at random in accordance with subparagraph (A); and
“(ii) the judge is a district judge in active service.
“(2) Number of judges required to conduct proceedings.—No temporary restraining order, stay, preliminary injunction, or other equitable relief may be granted in an action described in subsection (a)(2) unless a majority of the district court for the action orders that such relief be granted.
“(3) Appointments of masters.—No single judge shall appoint a master, or order a reference to a magistrate judge, or hear and determine applications for preliminary or permanent relief in an action described in subsection (a)(2).”. <all>
Comments