Skip to main content
CivicGate

HRES 286
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit certain documents relating to the dangerous, unaccountable use of AI by the United States DOGE Service to jeopardize the private information and essential services of the American people.

Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit certain documents relating to the dangerous, unaccountable use of AI by the United States DOGE Service to jeopardize the private information and essential services of the American people.

Introduced Apr 1, 2025

Latest action (Apr 30, 2025) Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

Summary

  • Requests that the President transmit documents relating to artificial intelligence technology newly deployed at federal agencies by or under the direction of individuals associated with the Department of Government Efficiency.
  • Requests documentation of federal data and sources of data fed into such AI technology, including whether the data contains sensitive personal information of American citizens.
  • Requests documentation of all individuals involved in policy decisions and technical planning related to AI deployment and federal data analysis.
  • Requests documentation of any concerns raised by federal workers regarding compliance with the Privacy Act and transparency requirements.
  • Requests lists of federal expenditures, programs, and personnel identified by AI software for potential cuts or freezes.
  • Requests communications regarding the legality and potential harms of any such cuts or freezes identified through AI analysis.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Melanie A. Stansbury’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • Employer not reported $121,292
  • SINGLETON SCHREIBER LLP $7,600
  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO $7,222
  • LAMB ENTERPRISE GROUP $6,600
  • CALCULEX INC. $6,600

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Melanie A. Stansbury → · Outside spending →

Actions (4)

  1. Apr 30, 2025 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
  2. Apr 1, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. · house
  3. Apr 1, 2025 Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1386)
  4. Apr 1, 2025 Submitted in House

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Committee action

What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.

Meetings where this bill was on the agenda

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 1, 2025

Ms. Stansbury (for herself, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Norton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Mfume, Ms. Brown, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Garcia of California, Mr. Frost, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Casar, Ms. Crockett, Ms. Randall, Mr. Subramanyam, Ms. Ansari, Mr. Bell, Ms. Simon, Mr. Min, and Ms. Pressley) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit certain documents relating to the dangerous, unaccountable use of AI by the United States DOGE Service to jeopardize the private information and essential services of the American people.

Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit, to the extent that such documents are in the possession of the President, to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the adoption of this resolution, in a complete and unredacted form, a copy of any document, record, report, memorandum, correspondence, or other communication that refers or relates to the following:

(1) Any artificial intelligence (AI) technology newly deployed or used at a Federal agency, by or at the direction of Elon Musk or an individual associated with the United States DOGE Service or DOGE, from January 20, 2025, to present, including any associated System of Records Notice, Privacy Impact Assessment, or Authorization to Operate.

(2) The Federal data and sources of Federal data fed into such AI technology, including any reference as to whether such data contains the sensitive, personally identifiable information of American citizens.

(3) All individuals involved in both the policy decisions and technical planning associated with the feeding of sensitive Federal data to AI technology from January 20, 2025, to present, including—

(A) individuals involved in plans to use AI technology to cut payments—

(i) to Americans; or

(ii) associated with programs for Americans; and

(B) individuals involved in plans to collect and feed government contract data through AI software, including any concerns raised or steps taken to mitigate Elon Musk’s related conflicts of interest.

(4) Any concerns raised by Federal workers that such actions by the Trump Administration violated the Privacy Act and the security of Americans’ private information.

(5) Any concerns raised by Federal workers that such actions by the Trump Administration violated the Advancing American AI Act by failing to publicly disclose current and planned AI use cases to ensure transparency for the American people.

(6) Any lists of Federal expenditures, programs, or personnel identified by AI software for freezes or cuts.

(7) Any analyses undertaken by any individual to determine which of such AI-identified expenditures, programs, or personnel to freeze or cut.

(8) Any communication or correspondence regarding—

(A) the legality of such freezes or cuts;

(B) the harms to the American people of such freezes or cuts; and

(C) whether employees of DOGE or their associates believe that legality or harm to the American people are important considerations in their actions.

(9) All individuals who managed or accessed Federal data in the process of feeding it through AI technology, including whether such individuals were Federal workers at the time of their data management or access and, if so—

(A) under what authority they were hired; and

(B) what background investigation and clearance processes they underwent as part of the hiring process.

(10) All records, logs, code, certificates, and configurations for all Federal IT assets, databases, or repositories accessed by employees of DOGE in training or deploying new AI software. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…