Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 9437
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Right to Vote Act

Protecting the right to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jun 24, 2026

Latest action (Jun 24, 2026) Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Issues
Voting & Elections

Summary

  • Establishes a fundamental right to vote in federal elections for all citizens of legal voting age.
  • Prohibits government from diminishing voting ability unless using the least restrictive means to further an important government interest.
  • Prohibits government from substantially impairing voting ability unless the impairment significantly furthers an important government interest.
  • Allows individuals to bring civil actions in federal district court to challenge violations, with courts required to expedite case disposition.
  • Establishes that plaintiffs must show by preponderance of evidence that a voting rule diminishes or impairs voting, and government must show by clear and convincing evidence the action furthers an important interest.
  • Allows recovery of attorney's fees for successful plaintiffs in voting rights cases and applies to federal elections beginning September 1, 2026.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Summer L. Lee’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $73,753
  • UPMC $30,910
  • MPI $11,600
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH $10,554
  • ADVOCATE AURORA HEALTH $10,000

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Summer L. Lee → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Jun 24, 2026 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
  2. Jun 24, 2026 Introduced in House

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 24, 2026

Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. Neguse, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Ramirez, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Deluzio, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Simon, Mr. Peters, Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Carson, Mr. Casar, Mr. Frost, Ms. Craig, Ms. McClellan, Ms. Pressley, Mr. Veasey, Ms. Omar, and Mr. Green of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

Protecting the right to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Right to Vote Act”.

SEC. 2. UNDUE BURDENS ON THE ABILITY TO VOTE IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE PROHIBITED.

(a) In General.—Every citizen of legal voting age shall have the fundamental right to vote in elections for Federal office.

(b) Retrogression.—A government may not diminish the ability to vote in an election for Federal office unless the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action causing the diminishment is the least restrictive means of significantly furthering an important, particularized government interest.

(c) Substantial Impairment.—A government may not substantially impair the ability to vote in an election for Federal office unless the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action causing the impairment significantly furthers an important, particularized governmental interest. A substantial impairment is a non-trivial impairment that makes it more difficult to vote than if the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action had not been adopted or implemented. An impairment may be substantial even if the voter or other similarly situated voters are able to vote notwithstanding the impairment.

SEC. 3. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

(a) Civil Action.—An action challenging a violation of the rights created by this Act may be brought in the district court for the District of Columbia, or the district court for the district in which the violation took place or where any defendant resides or does business, at the selection of the plaintiff, to obtain all appropriate relief, whether declaratory or injunctive, or facial or as-applied. Process may be served in any district where a defendant resides, does business, or may be found.

(b) Standards To Be Applied.—Courts adjudicating actions brought to enforce the rights created by this Act shall apply the following standards:

(1) Retrogression.—

(A) A plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of retrogression by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that a rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action diminishes the ability, or otherwise makes it more difficult, to vote.

(B) Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case as described in subparagraph (A), the government shall be provided an opportunity to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the diminishment is necessary to significantly further an important, particularized governmental interest.

(C) If the government meets its burden under subparagraph (B), the challenged rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action shall nonetheless be deemed invalid if the plaintiff demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the government could adopt or implement a less- restrictive means of furthering the particular important governmental interest.

(2) Substantial impairment.—

(A) A plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of substantial impairment by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that a rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action substantially impairs the ability, or makes it substantially difficult, to vote.

(B) Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case as described in subparagraph (A), the government shall be provided an opportunity to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the impairment significantly furthers an important, particularized governmental interest.

(c) Duty To Expedite.—It shall be the duty of the court to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest reasonable extent the disposition of the action and appeal under this section.

(d) Attorney’s Fees.—Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended—

(1) by striking “or section 40302” and inserting “section 40302”; and

(2) by striking “, the court” and inserting “, or the Right to Vote Act, the court”.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act—

(1) the term “covered entity” means the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each territory and possession of the United States;

(2) the terms “election” and “Federal office” have the meanings given such terms in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101);

(3) the term “government” includes a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, and official (or other person acting under color of law) of the United States, of any State, of any covered entity, or of any political subdivision of any State or covered entity; and

(4) the term “vote” means all actions necessary to make a vote effective, including registration or other action required by law as a prerequisite to voting, casting a ballot, and having such ballot counted and included in the appropriate totals of votes cast with respect to candidates for public office for which votes are received in an election.

SEC. 5. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

(a) Burdens Not Authorized.—Nothing in this Act may be construed to authorize a government to burden the right to vote in elections for Federal office.

(b) Other Rights and Remedies.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to alter any rights existing under a State constitution or the Constitution of the United States, or to limit any remedies for any other violations of Federal, State, or local law.

SEC. 6. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any citizen or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provisions of such to any citizen or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATES.

(a) Actions Brought for Retrogression.—Subsection (b) of section 2 shall apply to any law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action that was not in effect during the November 2024 general election for Federal office but that will be in effect with respect to elections for Federal office occurring on or after September 1, 2026, even if such law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action is already in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) Actions Brought for Substantial Impairment.—Subsection (c) of section 2 shall apply to any law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action in effect with respect to elections for Federal office occurring on or after September 1, 2026. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…