Skip to main content
CivicGate

S 3008
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

No Shari’a Act

To prohibit the application of Shari'a in the United States where such application would violate constitutional rights, and for other purposes.

Introduced Oct 15, 2025

Latest action (Oct 15, 2025) Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Issues
Civil Rights

Summary

The No Shari'a Act prohibits U.S. courts from enforcing judgments, decrees, or arbitration decisions based on Shari'a or other foreign law when such enforcement would violate constitutional rights. The bill specifies that contract provisions selecting foreign law are valid only if their enforcement would not result in violation of constitutional rights, and establishes that in family law matters involving marriage, divorce, child custody, adoption, or inheritance, courts cannot apply foreign law if it is inconsistent with fundamental rights or public policy. The bill directs the Attorney General to issue regulations and provide judicial education to ensure uniform application and takes effect 180 days after enactment.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Tommy Tuberville’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $68,223
  • BEASLEY ALLEN $19,800
  • RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES $13,782
  • BEASLEY ALLEN LAW FIRM $13,200
  • LEWIS M. CARTER MANUFACTURING COMPANY $12,100

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Tommy Tuberville → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Oct 15, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. · senate
  2. Oct 15, 2025 Introduced in Senate

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

October 15, 2025

Mr. Tuberville (for himself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the application of Shari’a in the United States where such application would violate constitutional rights, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “No Shari’a Act”.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Constitution of the United States is and must remain the supreme law of the land, and no foreign law or legal system may be permitted to undermine it;

(2) attempts to apply foreign law, including religious or international codes, in United States courts risk eroding constitutional protections, particularly in matters of family law, contract law, and civil rights;

(3) safeguarding constitutional rights is especially urgent in cases involving women, children, and vulnerable populations who may face coercion or unequal treatment under foreign legal systems;

(4) while individuals are free to practice their religion and observe personal codes voluntarily, United States courts must never enforce or give effect to laws that conflict with fundamental liberties guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States; and

(5) this Act is necessary to reaffirm and protect the rights of all citizens by ensuring that only United States laws govern United States courts.

SEC. 3. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:

(1) The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States requires State and Federal courts to apply United States law above Shari’a or any foreign law.

(2) In certain judicial and arbitration cases, parties have sought to apply foreign law contrary to United States constitutional guarantees.

(3) Clear and uniform rules are needed to prevent erosion of constitutional protections in all jurisdictions.

(b) Purposes.—The purposes of this Act are—

(1) to prohibit the enforcement of Shari’a or any foreign law that infringes on constitutional rights;

(2) to affirm that United States courts must rely solely on Federal and State law; and

(3) provide certainty and clarity in the application of constitutional protections nationwide.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) Court.—The term “court” means any Federal, State, or territorial court, including arbitration tribunals when decisions are subject to judicial enforcement.

(2) Foreign law.—The term “foreign law” means any law, legal code, or system derived from a jurisdiction outside the United States or its territories, including religious law when invoked as a substitute for State or Federal law.

(3) Fundamental rights.—The term “fundamental rights” means rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and by State constitutions, including due process, equal protection, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and rights related to marriage, child custody, and property.

SEC. 5. APPLICATION OF SHARI’A.

(a) Prohibition.—No court shall enforce a judgment, decree, or arbitration decision that relies, in whole or in part, on Shari’a or any foreign law that violates the constitutional rights of any party.

(b) Contracts.—A contract provision choosing foreign law shall be valid unless enforcement would result in a violation of constitutional rights.

(c) Family Law.—In matters involving marriage, divorce, child custody, adoption, or inheritance, no court shall apply or enforce foreign law if inconsistent with fundamental rights or public policy.

SEC. 6. RULEMAKING.

The Attorney General of the United States, in consultation with the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, shall issue regulations and provide judicial education to ensure uniform application of this Act.

SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act is held invalid, the remainder of the Act and its application shall not be affected.

SEC. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment of this Act. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…