Skip to main content
CivicGate

S 2601
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

A bill to improve the planning, programming, and budget coordination for operations of cyber mission force of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

To improve the planning, programming, and budget coordination for operations of cyber mission force of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jul 31, 2025

Latest action (Jul 31, 2025) Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Issues
DefenseEconomy & Taxes

Summary

This bill improves planning and budget coordination for the military's cyber mission force by giving the Commander of U.S. Cyber Command direct responsibility for planning, programming, budgeting, and managing resources to train, equip, operate, and sustain the cyber mission force. The Commander will prepare separate budget materials and submissions for the Department of Defense that are distinct from other military departments, though this responsibility excludes military pay and facility support provided by the military departments. The bill requires consultation between the Cyber Command Commander and military department secretaries before each submits its budget proposal, with provisions for including dissenting views if disagreements arise over funding levels for reserve component cyber forces. This coordination aims to streamline budget processes and ensure clear lines of authority for cyber force resources.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Mike Rounds’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT $30,350
  • NULL $26,450
  • APOLLO $19,250
  • ROCKET MORTGAGE $15,700
  • APOLLO MGMT. $13,200

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Mike Rounds → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Jul 31, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services. · senate
  2. Jul 31, 2025 Introduced in Senate

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 31, 2025

Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To improve the planning, programming, and budget coordination for operations of cyber mission force of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, AND BUDGET COORDINATION FOR OPERATIONS OF CYBER MISSION FORCE.

Section 167b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

“(f) Planning, Programming, and Budgeting.—(1)(A) In addition to the activities of a combatant command for which funding may be requested under section 166(b) of this title, the Commander of the United States Cyber Command shall, subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense, be responsible for directly controlling and managing the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution of resources to train, equip, operate, and sustain the cyber mission force, which shall include the following:

“(i) Preparation of a program objective memorandum and budget estimate submission for the resources required to train, equip, operate, and sustain the cyber mission force.

“(ii) Preparation of budget materials pertaining to the United States Cyber Command for inclusion in the budget justification materials that are submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year, as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, that is separate from any other military department or component of the Department of Defense.

“(B) The responsibilities assigned to the Commander of the United States Cyber Command pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall not include the following:

“(i) Military pay and allowances.

“(ii) Funding for facility support that is provided by the military departments.

“(2)(A) Before the budget proposal for the United States Cyber Command for any fiscal year is submitted to the Secretary of Defense, the Commander of the United States Cyber Command shall consult with the Secretaries of the military departments concerning funding for units of the reserve components within the cyber mission force. If the Secretary of a military department does not concur in the recommended level of funding with respect to any such unit that is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the military department, the Commander shall include with the budget proposal submitted to the Secretary of Defense the views of the Secretary of the military department concerning such funding.

“(B) Before the budget proposal for a military department for any fiscal year is submitted to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the military department shall consult with the Commander of the United States Cyber Command concerning funding for cyber mission forces within the reserve component in the military personnel budget for that military department. If the Commander does not concur in the recommended level of funding with respect to individual augmentees or units within the reserve component, the Secretary of the military department shall include with the budget proposal submitted to the Secretary of Defense the views of the Commander.”. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…