S 1322 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To amend the Controlled Substances Act relating to controlled substance analogues.
Summary
- Establishes factors to consider when determining if a controlled substance analogue was intended for human consumption, including marketing, labeling, efficacy, price differences, and evidence of diversion from legitimate channels.
- Requires consideration of whether the defendant knew or should have known the substance was intended for consumption by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or other immediate means.
- Specifies that labeling a substance as not for human consumption is not sufficient, by itself, to establish that it was not intended for human consumption.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
-
Sen. Klobuchar, Amy (D-MN)
5 cosponsors
- Sen. Begich, Mark (D-AK)
- Sen. Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
-
Sen. Graham, Lindsey (R-SC) -
Sen. Schumer, Charles E. (D-NY) -
Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon (D-RI)
Actions (4)
- May 14, 2014 Committee on United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control. Hearings held. · senate
- Sep 25, 2013 Committee on United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control. Hearings held. · senate
- Jul 18, 2013 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. · senate
- Jul 18, 2013 Introduced in Senate
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
July 18, 2013
Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Graham, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Controlled Substances Act relating to controlled substance analogues.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Synthetic Abuse and Labeling of Toxic Substances Act of 2013” or the “SALTS Act”.
SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALOGUES.
Section 203 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 813) is amended—
(1) by striking “A controlled” and inserting “(a) In General.—A controlled”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(b) Determination.—In determining whether a controlled substance analogue was intended for human consumption under subsection (a), the following factors may be considered, along with any other relevant factors:
“(1) The marketing, advertising, and labeling of the substance.
“(2) The known efficacy or usefulness of the substance for the marketed, advertised or labeled purpose.
“(3) The difference between the price at which the substance is sold and the price at which the substance it is purported to be or advertised as is normally sold.
“(4) The diversion of the substance from legitimate channels and the clandestine importation, manufacture, or distribution of the substance.
“(5) Whether the defendant knew or should have known the substance was intended to be consumed by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or any other immediate means.
“(c) Limitation.—For purposes of this section, evidence that a substance was not marketed, advertised, or labeled for human consumption, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish that the substance was not intended for human consumption.”. <all>
Comments