Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 376
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Historic Roadways Protection Act

To prohibit the use of funds by the Secretary of the Interior to finalize and implement certain travel management plans in the State of Utah.

Introduced Jan 14, 2025

Latest action (Jan 14, 2025) Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Referred to
Natural Resources Committee
Policy area
Public Lands and Natural Resources
Legislative subjects (3)
Land use and conservationRoads and highwaysUtah

Summary

This bill prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from using Federal funds to finalize or implement certain travel management plans on federal lands in Utah during an ongoing legal dispute. Specifically, it blocks funding for new travel management plans in nine designated areas and prevents implementation of four existing plans including the San Rafael Swell and Indian Creek plans. The prohibition remains in effect until a series of lawsuits brought by Utah counties against the federal government over land rights are fully resolved.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)
3 cosponsors

Actions (2)
  1. Jan 14, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. · house
  2. Jan 14, 2025 Introduced in House

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

  • S 90 — Historic Roadways Protection Act (shares 3 subjects)
  • S 1363 — New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • S 3493 — Carson City Public Land Correction Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • S 1787 — Dolores River National Conservation Area and Special Management Area Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • S 4458 — Caja del Rio Protection Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • HR 2785 — New Mexico Land Grant-Mercedes Historical or Traditional Use Cooperation and Coordination Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • HR 8616 — Caja del Rio Protection Act (shares 2 subjects)
  • HR 7979 — Public Lands Access Restoration Act (shares 2 subjects)

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

  • S 90 — Historic Roadways Protection Act · Introduced Feb 4, 2026 · Cong. 119 83%
  • HR 3618 — American Land and Property Protection Act · Introduced May 29, 2025 · Cong. 119 70%
  • HR 3207 — DEFENSE Act · Introduced May 6, 2025 · Cong. 119 70%
  • HR 4877 — Central Coast Heritage Protection Act · Introduced Aug 5, 2025 · Cong. 119 70%
  • S 779 — Safe Highways and Infrastructure Preservation Act · Introduced Apr 28, 2010 · Cong. 111 69%
  • HR 3421 — Gunnison Outdoor Resources Protection Act of 2025 · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Cong. 119 69%

Text versions (1)
  • Introduced in House · Jan 14, 2025

Only one text version is on file, so there’s no earlier version to compare against yet.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 14, 2025

Mr. Kennedy of Utah (for himself, Mr. Owens, Mr. Moore of Utah, and Ms. Maloy) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds by the Secretary of the Interior to finalize and implement certain travel management plans in the State of Utah.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Historic Roadways Protection Act”.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF USE OF FUNDS TO FINALIZE AND IMPLEMENT CERTAIN TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS IN THE STATE OF UTAH.

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Applicable period.—The term “applicable period” means the period that begins on the date of enactment of this Act and ends on the date on which the Secretary certifies to Congress that each of the R.S. 2477 cases has been adjudicated.

(2) Covered travel management area.—The term “covered travel management area” means any of the following travel management areas in the State of Utah:

(A) The Henry Mountains and Fremont Gorge Travel Management Area.

(B) The Dinosaur (North) Travel Management Area.

(C) The Book Cliffs Travel Management Area (Vernal Field Office).

(D) The Nine Mile Canyon Travel Management Area (Vernal Field Office).

(E) The San Rafael Swell Travel Management Area.

(F) The Nine Mile Canyon Travel Management Area (Price Field Office).

(G) The Book Cliffs Travel Management Area (Moab Field Office).

(H) The Dolores River Travel Management Area.

(I) The Trail Canyon Travel Management Area.

(J) The Paunsaugunt Travel Management Area.

(3) R.S. 2477 case.—The term “R.S. 2477 case” means each of—

(A) Beaver County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-423-CW);

(B) Box Elder County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 1:12-cv-105-DB);

(C) Carbon County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-427-DB);

(D) Daggett County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-447-RJS);

(E) Duchesne County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-425-CW);

(F) Emery County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-429-CW);

(G) Garfield County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-478-TC);

(H) Grand County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-466-DN);

(I) Iron County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-472-BSJ);

(J) Juab County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-462-DB);

(K) Kane County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-1073-CW) (consolidated with Case No. 2:11-cv-1031-CW; Case No. 2:12-cv-476-CW);

(L) Millard County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-451-DB);

(M) Piute County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-428-CW);

(N) Rich County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-424-DN);

(O) San Juan County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-467-DAK);

(P) Sanpete County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-430-DB);

(Q) Sevier County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-452-DN);

(R) Tooele County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-477-CW);

(S) Uintah County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-461-DAK);

(T) Utah County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-426-CW);

(U) Washington County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-471-RJS); and

(V) Wayne County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12-cv-434-DN).

(4) Secretary.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.

(b) Prohibition on Use of Funds by the Secretary of the Interior To Finalize and Implement Certain Travel Management Plans.—During the applicable period, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not obligate or expend Federal funds—

(1) to finalize or implement, with respect to land within the boundary of the State of Utah, a new travel management plan for a covered travel management area; or

(2) to implement, with respect to land within the boundary of the State of Utah—

(A) the Indian Creek (Canyon Rims) Travel Management Plan;

(B) the San Rafael Desert Travel Management Plan;

(C) the San Rafael Swell Travel Management Plan; or

(D) the Labyrinth/Gemini Bridges Travel Management Plan. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…