HR 2516

0likes☆Favorite🔕SubscribeShare

Introduced ↻ Update bill dataRe-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click. Contact your reps Urge the sponsor

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 31, 2025

Mr. Owens (for himself, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Rose, Mr. Babin, Mr. Onder, Mr. Moore of West Virginia, and Mr. Messmer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce

January 13, 2026

Additional sponsors: Mr. Finstad, Mr. Steube, Mr. Fine, and Mr. Guthrie

January 13, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 31, 2025]

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit political litmus tests in accreditation of institutions of higher education, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Accreditation for College Excellence Act of 2025”.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL LITMUS TESTS IN ACCREDITATION OF INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

(a) Operating Procedures Required.—Section 496(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1099b(c)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (8), by striking “and” at the end;

(2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“(10) confirms that the standards for accreditation of the agency or association do not—

“(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B)—

“(i) require, encourage, or coerce any institution to—

“(I) support, oppose, or commit to supporting or opposing— “(aa) a specific partisan, political, or ideological viewpoint or belief or set of such viewpoints or beliefs; or “(bb) a specific viewpoint or belief or set of viewpoints or beliefs on social, cultural, or political issues; or

“(II) support or commit to supporting the disparate treatment of any individual or group of individuals on the basis of any protected class under Federal civil rights law, except as required by Federal law or a court order; or

“(ii) assess an institution’s or program of study’s commitment to any ideology, belief, or viewpoint;

“(B) prohibit an institution—

“(i) from having a religious mission, operating as a religious institution, or being controlled by a religious organization (in a manner described in paragraph (1), (2), (3),

(4), (5), or (6) of section 106.12(c) of title 34, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this paragraph)), or from requiring an applicant, student, employee, or independent contractor (such as an adjunct professor) of such an institution to—

“(I) provide or adhere to a statement of faith; or

“(II) adhere to a code of conduct consistent with the stated religious mission of such institution or the religious tenets of such organization; or

“(ii) from requiring an applicant, student, employee, or contractor to take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States; or

“(C) require, encourage, or coerce an institution of higher education to violate any right protected by the Constitution.”.

(b) Limitation on Scope of Criteria.—Section 496 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1099b) is further amended by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:

“(g) Limitation on Scope of Criteria.—

“(1) In general.—The Secretary shall not establish criteria for accrediting agencies or associations that are not required by this section.

“(2) Institutional eligibility.—An institution that is in compliance with the standards of its accrediting agency or association that assess the institution in accordance with subsection (a)(5) shall meet the accreditation requirements for certification as an institution of higher education under section 102 and subpart 3 of this part, regardless of any additional standards adopted by the agency or association for purposes unrelated to participation in programs under this Act.”.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to prevent religious accreditors from holding and enforcing religious standards on institutions they choose to accredit. Union Calendar No. 380

119th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 2516

[Report No. 119-444]

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit political litmus tests in accreditation of institutions of higher education, and for other purposes.

January 13, 2026

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed