SB 129 CO Introduced
Mitigate Impacts of Tax Increment Financing
A state bill is a proposed law in a state legislature — separate from the U.S. Congress. Learn more →
Summary
Current law requires county revitalization authorities and urban renewal authorities to, in certain instances, submit impact reports that detail the potential impacts of a proposed urban renewal or county revitalization plan on local services and infrastructure. The bill requires taxing entities that would be subject to tax increment financing pursuant to a proposed urban renewal or county revitalization plan to file either a certification of or a technical rebuttal to an impact report. If a taxing entity does not file either a certification or a technical rebuttal within 45 days after a county revitalization authority or urban renewal authority's submission of an urban renewal or county revitalization impact report, the impact report is presumed certified. The bill also requires taxing entities that would be subject to tax increment financing pursuant to a downtown development authority's proposed plan of development to file either a certification of or a technical rebuttal to a downtown development authority's impact report.On or before October 1, 2027, and on or before October 1 of each year thereafter, the legislative council staff is required to prepare a report or issue brief on the impact of tax increment financing on the state and local shares of education funding.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Sponsors (2)
- J. Marchman Democratic · sponsor
- A. Boesenecker Democratic · sponsor
Action history (2)
- Mar 19, 2026 Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely · upper
- Feb 25, 2026 Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing · upper
Full text
The full text hasn’t been imported yet. CivicGate fetches it from the state legislature’s published version documents — check now.
Comments
Data from OpenStates. View on OpenStates →
Comments