SB 297 DE

0likes☆Favorite🔕SubscribeShare

Became Law

This Act adds a clarifying interpretive paragraph to the Delaware Consumer Fraud Act (Subchapter II, Chapter 25, Title 6 of the Code) to address a recent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court and to make clear that the Consumer Fraud Act’s use of the phrase “in connection with” in § 2513 should be interpreted to include unfair and deceptive acts and practices that occur “before, during, and after” the sale, lease, receipt, or advertisement of any merchandise. The Delaware Supreme Court recently construed the Consumer Fraud Act to be confined to conduct “between businesses and consumers which happen before a transaction or during the transaction itself.” Blue Beach Bungalows DE, LLC v. State, No. 14, 2025, 2025 WL 3768232, at *11 (Del. Dec. 30, 2025). However, in recognition of the broad purpose of the Consumer Fraud Act set forth by the 123rd General Assembly in Section 2512, subsequent amendments to the Consumer Fraud Act to include the “receipt” of merchandise, and the scope of comparable statutes in other states, this bill ensures that the Consumer Fraud Act is interpreted to apply to unfair or deceptive conduct that occurs after a sale, lease, receipt, or advertisement, including, but not limited to, conduct occurring in instances in which a sale, lease, receipt, or advertisement creates an ongoing relationship or a continuing obligation, or where performance has not yet been completed. This aligns the Consumer Fraud Act with Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices (“UDAP”) laws with similar language in other states, as well as many other UDAP laws, including the FTC Act, that cover post-transaction conduct. This Act will allow the Delaware Department of Justice to use the Consumer Fraud Act to address the full range of unfair and deceptive acts or practices that consumers report to the Delaware Department of Justice, including, for example, false and threatening landlord communications, unscrupulous debt collection tactics, and failures to honor promises to fix returned merchandise. It will also ensure that businesses throughout the state can compete on a level playing field throughout the duration of their relationships with consumers, without being undercut by unscrupulous competitors who engage in post-transaction misconduct. Additionally, it ensures that the Delaware Department of Justice is not disadvantaged when coordinating with other states to hold entities accountable for unfair or deceptive acts or practices that are nationwide in scope.

• Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic · primary
• Nicole Poore Democratic · primary
• Sarah McBride · primary
• Marie Pinkney Democratic · primary
• David P. Sokola Democratic · primary
• Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic · primary
• John "Jack" Walsh Democratic · primary
• Darius J. Brown Democratic · primary
• Franklin D. Cooke Democratic · primary
• Mara Gorman Democratic · primary
• Cyndie Romer Democratic · primary

1. May 4, 2026 Introduced and Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate · upper
2. May 13, 2026 Reported Out of Committee (Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits · upper
3. May 20, 2026 Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT · upper
4. May 21, 2026 Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House · lower
5. Jun 10, 2026 Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 8 On Its Merits · lower
6. Jun 25, 2026 Passed By House. Votes: 36 YES 1 NO 4 ABSENT · lower
7. Jul 23, 2026 Signed by Governor · executive