S 9138 NY Passed Legislature
Relates to a death benefit option for the wife of deceased justice Jerry Garguilo
A state bill is a proposed law in a state legislature — separate from the U.S. Congress. Learn more →
Summary
Authorizes a death benefit option for the beneficiary of deceased justice Jerry Garguilo, a justice of the unified court system.
Sponsor (1)
- Anthony H. Palumbo Republican · primary
5 coauthors / cosponsors
- Mario Mattera Republican · cosponsor
- Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick Republican · cosponsor
- Jack M. Martins Republican · cosponsor
- Dean Murray Republican · cosponsor
- Steve Rhoads Republican · cosponsor
Action history (10)
- Feb 5, 2026 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS · upper
- Jun 4, 2026 COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES · upper
- Jun 4, 2026 ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1741 · upper
- Jun 4, 2026 PASSED SENATE · upper
- Jun 4, 2026 DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY · upper
- Jun 4, 2026 REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS · lower
- Jun 5, 2026 SUBSTITUTED FOR A10382 · lower
- Jun 5, 2026 ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.579 · lower
- Jun 5, 2026 PASSED ASSEMBLY · lower
- Jun 5, 2026 RETURNED TO SENATE · lower
Text versions (2)
Full text
Full text imported from assembly.state.ny.us
Skip to main content
New York State Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie
--> --> -->
Assembly Members
Legislative Info
Public Hearings
Speaker's Press
Assembly Reports
Committees & More
Bill Search Home Laws Legislative Calendar Public Hearing Schedule Assembly Calendars Assembly Committee Agenda Javascript must be enabled to properly view this page.
Bill No.: Summary Actions Committee Votes Floor Votes Memo Text LFIN Chamber Video/Transcript S09138 Summary: BILL NO S09138   SAME AS SAME AS A10382
  SPONSOR PALUMBO   COSPNSR MATTERA, CANZONERI-FITZPATRICK, MARTINS, MURRAY, RHOADS   MLTSPNSR  
  Authorizes a death benefit option for the beneficiary of deceased justice Jerry Garguilo, a justice of the unified court system.
Go to top S09138 Text:
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________
9138
IN SENATE
February 5, 2026 ___________
Introduced by Sens. PALUMBO, MATTERA, CANZONERI-FITZPATRICK, MARTINS, MURRAY, RHOADS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions
AN ACT relating to a death benefit option for the beneficiary of justice Jerry Garguilo
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, Ange- 2 la Garguilo, the beneficiary of justice Jerry Garguilo, a deceased 3 justice of the unified court system, may elect to receive in a lump sum 4 an amount payable which shall be equal to the pension reserve that would 5 have been established had justice Jerry Garguilo retired as of the date 6 of his death, or the value of the death benefit and the reserve-for-in- 7 creased-take-home-pay, if any, whichever is greater. 8 § 2. In the event the beneficiary is required to make an election 9 prior to the enactment of this legislation, the pension reserve shall be 10 awarded minus any death benefit previously paid to said beneficiary. 11 § 3. All past service costs associated with implementing the 12 provisions of this act shall be borne by the state of New York and may 13 be amortized over a period of ten years. 14 § 4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, none 15 of the provisions of this act shall be subject to the appropriation 16 requirement of section 25 of the retirement and social security law. 17 § 5. This act shall take effect immediately. FISCAL NOTE.--Pursuant to Legislative Law, Section 50: This bill would allow the beneficiary of justice Jerry Garguilo to elect to receive a lump sum equal to the value of the pension reserve as if justice Jerry Garguilo retired on the date of their death. If elected, the pension reserve will be paid in lieu of any other death benefits and offset thereby. This bill will not increase the state of New York's annual contrib- utions. There will be an immediate past service cost of $196,000 borne by the state of New York unified court system as a one-time payment. This cost
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD13836-03-6
S. 9138 2
assumes that payment will be made on March 1, 2027. If the state of New York elects to amortize this cost over 10 years, the cost for each year will be $25,000. Summary of relevant resources: Membership data as of March 31, 2025 was used to measure the impact of the bill, the same data used in the Actuarial Valuations dated April 1, 2025. Distributions and other statistics can be found in the 2025 Report of the Actuary and the 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. The actuarial assumptions and methods used are described in the 2025 Annual Report to the Comptroller on Actuarial Assumptions, and the Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York: Audit and Control. The fair value of assets and GASB disclosures can be found in the 2025 Financial Statements and Supplementary Information. Assumptions, demographics, and other considerations may have been modified to better reflect specific provisions of any proposed benefit change(s). This fiscal note does not constitute a legal opinion on the viability of the bill, nor is it intended to serve as a substitute for the profes- sional judgment of an attorney. This estimate, dated January 26, 2026, and intended for use only during the 2026 Legislative Session, is Fiscal Note Number 2026-3. As Chief Actuary of the New York State and Local Retirement System (NYSLRS), I, Aaron Schottin Young, hereby certify that this analysis complies with applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice as well as the Code of Professional Conduct and Qualification Standards for Actuaries Issuing Statements of Actuarial Opinion of the American Academy of Actu- aries, of which I am a member. I am a member of NYSLRS but do not believe it impairs my objectivity.
Go to top
Sitemap
Request Information
Directions and Maps
Comments
Data from OpenStates. View on OpenStates →
Comments