HB 1309 CO Became Law
A state bill is a proposed law in a state legislature — separate from the U.S. Congress. Learn more →
Summary
This bill clarifies the definition of domestic violence under Colorado's Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act to include acts or threatened acts of harm or property damage against family or household members, regardless of whether the conduct constitutes a criminal offense. For family court proceedings determining parental responsibilities, the bill allows courts to consider any relevant evidence of domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or sexual assault and requires the court to make findings based on a preponderance of the evidence. If the court finds that a party has committed domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or sexual assault, the bill outlines specific considerations for determining parenting time and decision-making responsibility. The bill also changes the qualifications for mental health professionals treating domestic violence offenders, requiring specialized training and expertise in treating survivors and perpetrators rather than approval by a specific management board.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill (from the OpenStates abstract — no full text available yet) — neutral, and may be imperfect.
Official abstract
The act clarifies that, for the purposes of the 'Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act', domestic violence includes specified acts or threatened acts of harm or property damage against a family or household member; and clarifies that the conduct in the definition of domestic violence is domestic violence regardless of whether it constitutes a criminal offense. A person's protective behaviors do not constitute domestic violence. For purposes of determining the allocation of parental responsibilities based on the best interests of the child, the act requires that for any evidence submitted to the court concerning whether a party has committed domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or sexual assault that resulted in the conception of a child, the court may consider any relevant and admissible evidence, and the court shall make findings on the record by a preponderance of the evidence whether the party has committed domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or sexual assault that resulted in the conception of a child. If the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that a party has committed domestic violence, child abuse or neglect, or sexual assault that resulted in the conception of a child, the act outlines the considerations that the court must undertake when determining decision-making responsibility and parenting time. Under current law, prior to a court ordering a party accused of domestic violence or child abuse to take steps to improve a relationship with a protected party, a mental health professional who is approved by the domestic violence offender management board must verify the accused party's behavior. Instead, the act requires that the accused party participate in treatment with a mental health professional who holds a master's or doctoral degree and a mental health professional license and has specialized training and expertise in treating survivors and perpetrators of domestic violence and child abuse and the effects of domestic violence and child abuse.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsors (3)
- M. Froelich Democratic · sponsor
- T. Story Democratic · sponsor
- K. Wallace Democratic · sponsor
18 coauthors / cosponsors
- K. Brown Democratic · cosponsor
- C. Clifford Democratic · cosponsor
- M. Duran Democratic · cosponsor
- L. Goldstein Democratic · cosponsor
- S. Lieder Democratic · cosponsor
- M. Lindsay Democratic · cosponsor
- K. Nguyen Democratic · cosponsor
- M. Rutinel Democratic · cosponsor
- G. Rydin Democratic · cosponsor
- E. Sirota Democratic · cosponsor
- J. Willford Democratic · cosponsor
- J. Amabile Democratic · cosponsor
- J. Coleman Democratic · cosponsor
- L. Cutter Democratic · cosponsor
- T. Exum Democratic · cosponsor
- C. Kipp Democratic · cosponsor
- W. Lindstedt Democratic · cosponsor
- J. Marchman Democratic · cosponsor
Action history (15)
- May 27, 2026 Governor Signed · executive
- May 21, 2026 Sent to the Governor · executive
- May 21, 2026 Signed by the President of the Senate · upper
- May 21, 2026 Signed by the Speaker of the House · lower
- May 13, 2026 House Considered Senate Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass · lower
- May 13, 2026 Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments · upper
- May 12, 2026 Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee · upper
- May 11, 2026 Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments · upper
- May 7, 2026 Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole · upper
- May 7, 2026 Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs · upper
- May 6, 2026 House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments · lower
- May 5, 2026 House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor · lower
- May 5, 2026 House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole · lower
- Mar 31, 2026 House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations · lower
- Mar 2, 2026 Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary · lower
Full text
The full text hasn’t been imported yet. CivicGate fetches it from the state legislature’s published version documents — check now.
Comments
Data from OpenStates. View on OpenStates →
Comments