HB 1253 CO Became Law
Disconnection from Statutory Municipality
A state bill is a proposed law in a state legislature — separate from the U.S. Congress. Learn more →
Summary
This bill modifies how agricultural and farm land owners can disconnect their property from Colorado statutory municipalities. The bill prevents the use of the court decree disconnection process for land within urban renewal areas or special districts, requiring instead that disconnection applications go through the municipal ordinance process. The bill also requires property owners seeking disconnection to notify affected urban renewal authorities in addition to county commissioners and special districts. These entities may request a meeting with the property owner and municipality to discuss potential negative impacts from the disconnection, and failure to request a meeting constitutes an acknowledgment of no adverse effects. The bill applies to disconnection applications commenced on or after the applicable effective date.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill (from the OpenStates abstract — no full text available yet) — neutral, and may be imperfect.
Official abstract
Under current law, the owners of certain tracts of agricultural or farm land within and adjacent to the boundary of a statutory town or statutory city may petition the district court for the county to disconnect the land from the town or city (disconnection by court decree). The act modifies the disconnection by court decree process so that this process is not available for any tract of land that is included within the boundaries of an urban renewal area described in an urban renewal plan of an urban renewal authority (affected urban renewal authority) or a special district that, by its service plan or pursuant to an intergovernmental agreement, is or will be expected to provide service to the tract of land (affected special district). Instead of using the disconnection by court decree process, owners of these tracts of land must use the process for disconnection applications from a statutory municipality. Under current law, the owner of a tract of land within and adjacent to the boundary of a statutory municipality may apply to the governing body of the municipality for the enactment of an ordinance disconnecting the tract of land from the municipality (disconnection by ordinance). The act also modifies this disconnection by ordinance process by requiring that, in addition to the existing requirement that an owner provide notice and a copy of the disconnection application to the board of county commissioners of the county in which the tract of land is located and to the board of directors of any affected special district, the owner seeking disconnection must also provide notice and a copy of the disconnection application to any affected urban renewal authority. Upon receiving the notice and application, these entities may request a meeting with the owner of the land and the governing body of the municipality to discuss and address any negative impacts that would result from the disconnection, including any change in the level or extent of services being provided to the tract of land that is the subject of the disconnection application or any interference with the implementation of an urban renewal plan of an affected urban renewal authority. The failure of these entities to request a meeting constitutes an acknowledgment that the disconnection will not adversely affect them. The act applies to applications for disconnection from a statutory municipality and petitions for disconnection from a statutory city or town commenced on or after the applicable effective date of the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsors (3)
- S. Slaugh Republican · sponsor
- B. Kirkmeyer Republican · sponsor
- M. Snyder Democratic · sponsor
6 coauthors / cosponsors
- L. Goldstein Democratic · cosponsor
- S. Bright Republican · cosponsor
- J. Coleman Democratic · cosponsor
- L. Frizell Republican · cosponsor
- N. Hinrichsen Democratic · cosponsor
- C. Kipp Democratic · cosponsor
Action history (13)
- May 4, 2026 Governor Signed · executive
- Apr 23, 2026 Sent to the Governor · executive
- Apr 22, 2026 Signed by the President of the Senate · upper
- Apr 22, 2026 Signed by the Speaker of the House · lower
- Apr 2, 2026 Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments · upper
- Apr 1, 2026 Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments · upper
- Mar 31, 2026 Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/01/2026 - No Amendments · upper
- Mar 26, 2026 Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole · upper
- Mar 20, 2026 Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing · upper
- Mar 17, 2026 House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments · lower
- Mar 16, 2026 House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee · lower
- Mar 12, 2026 House Committee on Agriculture, Water & Natural Resources Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole · lower
- Feb 18, 2026 Introduced In House - Assigned to Agriculture, Water & Natural Resources · lower
Full text
The full text hasn’t been imported yet. CivicGate fetches it from the state legislature’s published version documents — check now.
Comments
Data from OpenStates. View on OpenStates →
Comments