HB 1286 IN

0likes☆Favorite🔕SubscribeShare

Became Law

Specifies that a party to a protective order proceeding has a duty to inform the court of any military protective orders issued by a military commander in effect between the parties. Allows the court to consider evidence of a military protective order in effect against a respondent for the protection of the petitioner. Amends provisions concerning facially valid foreign protection orders to include certain protection orders issued by a Canadian court.

• Ryan Lauer Republican · author
• Cyndi Carrasco Republican · sponsor

1. Jan 6, 2026 First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary · lower
2. Jan 6, 2026 Authored by Representative Lauer · lower
3. Jan 27, 2026 Representative Bauer added as coauthor · lower
4. Jan 27, 2026 Committee report: amend do pass, adopted · lower
5. Jan 27, 2026 Representative Zimmerman added as coauthor · lower
6. Jan 29, 2026 Second reading: ordered engrossed · lower
7. Feb 2, 2026 Senate sponsor: Senator Carrasco · lower
8. Feb 2, 2026 Third reading: passed; Roll Call 181: yeas 93, nays 0 · lower
9. Feb 3, 2026 Referred to the Senate · lower
10. Feb 5, 2026 First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary · upper
11. Feb 12, 2026 Committee report: do pass, adopted · upper
12. Feb 17, 2026 Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed · upper
13. Feb 17, 2026 Amendment #1 (Freeman) prevailed; voice vote · upper
14. Feb 24, 2026 Third reading: passed; Roll Call 251: yeas 47, nays 0 · upper
15. Feb 25, 2026 House concurred with Senate amendments; Roll Call 376: yeas 95, nays 0 · lower
16. Feb 25, 2026 Returned to the House with amendments · upper
17. Feb 25, 2026 Motion to concur filed · lower
18. Feb 26, 2026 Signed by the Speaker · lower
19. Feb 27, 2026 Signed by the President Pro Tempore · upper
20. Feb 27, 2026 Signed by the President of the Senate · upper
21. Mar 4, 2026 Public Law 90 · lower
22. Mar 4, 2026 Signed by the Governor · executive