HB 1072 IN Passed One Chamber
A state bill is a proposed law in a state legislature — separate from the U.S. Congress. Learn more →
Summary
Provides that a school corporation must distribute a portion of revenue received from a school operating referendum tax levy or school safety referendum levy to each charter school in which students who receive not more than 50% virtual instruction and who have legal settlement in the school corporation attend. Provides that if a charter school receives a distribution from a school corporation from a school corporation tax levy or a school safety referendum tax levy, the charter school must post the certain information on the charter school's Internet web site. Provides that a charter school that may receive money from a school corporation's tax levy or a school safety referendum tax levy may not promote a position on a referendum in the same manner as a school corporation is prohibited from promoting a position on a referendum. Provides that the governing body of a school corporation in which 10% or more of the school corporation's school buildings are occupied in whole or part by: (1) one or more innovation network schools; or (2) one or more participating innovation network charter schools; may sell a closed, unused, or unoccupied school building without first offering the school building to a charter school or state educational institution. Makes conforming amendments.
Sponsors (2)
- Robert Behning Republican · author
- Brian Buchanan Republican · sponsor
2 coauthors / cosponsors
- Jake Teshka Republican · coauthor
- Timothy O'Brien Republican · coauthor
Action history (20)
- Jan 4, 2022 Authored by Representative Behning · lower
- Jan 4, 2022 First reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means · lower
- Jan 10, 2022 Representative Teshka J added as coauthor · lower
- Jan 24, 2022 Committee report: amend do pass, adopted · lower
- Jan 25, 2022 Representative O'Brien T added as coauthor · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #1 (Behning) prevailed; voice vote · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #2 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 106: yeas 24, nays 66 · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #5 (Harris) failed; Roll Call 107: yeas 26, nays 65 · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #3 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 108: yeas 27, nays 63 · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #4 (Porter) failed; voice vote · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #11 (Smith V) motion withdrawn · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #7 (Porter) failed; Roll Call 109: yeas 26, nays 62 · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #8 (DeLaney) failed; Roll Call 110: yeas 28, nays 67 · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Amendment #9 (Porter) motion withdrawn · lower
- Jan 26, 2022 Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed · lower
- Jan 27, 2022 Senate sponsors: Senators Buchanan and Garten · lower
- Jan 27, 2022 Third reading: passed; Roll Call 138: yeas 52, nays 39 · lower
- Jan 28, 2022 Referred to the Senate · lower
- Feb 8, 2022 First reading: referred to Committee on Appropriations · upper
- Feb 10, 2022 Senator Garten removed as second sponsor · upper
Text versions (3)
Full text
The full text hasn’t been imported yet. CivicGate fetches it from the state legislature’s published version documents — check now.
Comments
Data from OpenStates. View on OpenStates →
Comments