Issue positions (3)
Documented + CivicGate vote-derived — stated positions link their source; derived positions come from votes on direction-tagged bills
- Economy & TaxesPartial support from votes
- Foreign PolicyFull support from votes
- Voting & ElectionsFull support from votes
Campaign finance
2026 cycle
Incumbent for U.S. House UT-02 · 2026 General Election
- $2,536,636 raised
- $2,183,697 spent
- $1,886,962 cash on hand
| $2.54M | |
| $2.42M | |
| $999.55K | |
| Itemized (≥ $200) | $993.22K |
| Unitemized (< $200) | $6.33K |
| Other committees (PACs) | $1.42M |
| Transfers from other committees | $113.59K |
| Other receipts | $2.00K |
| $2.18M | |
| Operating expenditures | $1.61M |
| Contribution refunds | $30.01K |
| Other disbursements | $542.15K |
| Cash on hand | $1.89M |
| Debts owed by committee | $0.00 |
Through June 30, 2026 · FEC
Data from FEC (through Jun 30, 2026)
Over time
Data from FEC per-cycle campaign finance
Money raised, spent, and cash on hand across every election cycle on record — toggle a series in the legend.
| Cycle | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $863,677 | $835,315 | $28,362 |
| 2022 | $1,792,630 | $1,354,948 | $466,044 |
| 2024 | $2,633,423 | $1,565,444 | $1,534,023 |
| 2026 | $2,536,636 | $2,183,697 | $1,886,962 |
Top contributors (FEC)
Outside spending on this race
Data from FEC, Schedule E independent expenditures
Independent expenditures are money outside groups (PACs / super-PACs) spend to support or oppose a candidate without coordinating with their campaign. What's this? →
Documented relationships
Documented facts about Moore, aggregated from public records. A documented relationship is not evidence of wrongdoing — it is context, not a conclusion.
No documented relationships of this kind on record — absence is not a finding.
Committee activity
Committee votes cast
- YeaMr. Smith (MO) ✓ Mr. Neal ✓ Mr. Buchanan ✓ Mr. Doggett ✓ Mr. Smith (NE) ✓ Mr. Thompson ✓ Mr. Kelly ✓ Mr. Larson ✓ Mr. Schweikert ✓ Mr. Davis ✓ Mr. LaHood ✓ Ms. Sanchez ✓ Mr. Arrington ✓ Ms. Sewell Mr.
- YeaMr. Smith (MO) ✓ Mr. Neal ✓ Mr. Buchanan ✓ Mr. Doggett ✓ Mr. Smith (NE) ✓ Mr. Thompson ✓ Mr. Kelly ✓ Mr. Larson ✓ Mr. Schweikert ✓ Mr. Davis ✓ Mr. LaHood ✓ Ms. Sanchez ✓ Mr. Arrington ✓ Ms. Sewell ✓ M
- Did not votethe amendment offered by Mr
- YeaFinal Vote Results
- Naythe amendment offered by Mr
- YeaMr. Smith (MO) ✓ Mr. Neal ✓ Mr. Buchanan ✓ Mr. Doggett ✓ Mr. Smith (NE) ✓ Mr. Thompson ✓ Mr. Kelly ✓ Mr. Larson ✓ Mr. Schweikert ✓ Mr. Davis ✓ Mr. LaHood ✓ Ms. Sanchez ✓ Mr. Arrington ✓ Ms. Sewell ✓ M
- Naythe amendment offered by Mr
- YeaMr. Smith (MO) Mr. Neal Mr. Buchanan Mr. Doggett Mr. Smith (NE) Mr. Thompson Mr. Kelly Mr. Larson Mr. Schweikert Mr. Davis Mr. LaHood Ms. Sanchez Mr. Arrington Ms. Sewell Mr. Estes Ms. DelBene Mr. Smu
Congressional testimony
- Legislative hearing on six bills: • H.R. 34 (Rep. Gosar), “Land and Social Security Optimization Act” or the “LASSO Act” • H.R. 1329 (Rep. Malliotakis), “Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act” • H.R. 3553 (Rep. Min), “Building Resiliency and Understanding of Shrublands to Halt Fires Act” or the “BRUSH Fires Act” • H.R. 5478 (Rep. Moore of UT), “Fruit Heights Land Conveyance Act of 2025” • H.R. 5911 (Rep. Hurd), “Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act” • S. 282 (Sen. King), “Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument Access Act”
- Legislative Hearing on the following bills: • H.R. 6352 (Rep. Moore of UT), “Tax Stamp Revenue Transfer for Wildlife and Recreation Act”; • H.R. 8413 (Rep. Smith of NE), “Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs Land Conveyances Act”; • H.R. 8632 (Rep. Grothman), “Biodiversity Oversight Scaled-back And Fully Erased Act of 2024” or “BIOSAFE Act of 2024”; • H.R. 8836 (Rep. Zinke), “Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act”; and • Discussion Draft of H.R. ___ (Rep. Graves of LA), To require the Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service to establish a coastal protection and restoration grant program.
Comments