POLITICAL EDUCATION PATTERNS POLITICAL ARM INTL UNION OPERATING ENG LOCAL 18
Finance signals
Neutral "worth a look" observations computed from this committee's disclosed FEC totals — not accusations. A signal is not evidence of wrongdoing; each notes its caveats and links the filing.
Of $1,553,480 spent in 2022, 9.8% went directly to candidates or independent expenditures. Context, not a concern — the rest can be bundling, operations, or fundraising, which topline totals don't separate. The scam-PAC screen needs itemized Schedule B spending (being ingested).
A low direct-contribution share is common and legitimate — PACs also bundle contributions, run independent expenditures, and carry overhead, none of which show in this figure. Separating those (the scam-PAC screen) needs itemized Schedule B spending, which is being ingested. Not a finding.
Related committees & organizations
The committee's disclosed “family” from its FEC filing — affiliation and, for a leadership PAC, its sponsor. These are public relationships on the FEC record, shown as reported (not an inference of coordination).
By cycle
Members it contributed to
No itemized contributions to current members of Congress on record for this committee yet. (Contributions to former members, candidates, or other committees aren't listed here.) Backed by FEC Schedule A.
See all PACs & committees, finance signals, industry totals, or how money reaches a specific member on any member profile.