SRES 377 Passed Senate Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
S. RES. 377 Authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] (R-SD)
Actions (21)
- Sep 15, 2025 Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 517. · senate
- Sep 15, 2025 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 517.
- Sep 15, 2025 Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6591) · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Upon reconsideration, cloture on the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 43. Record Vote Number: 516. (CR S6564) · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Ruling of the Chair that the point of order raised by Senator Thune with respect to the precedent set on November 21, 2013 regarding the threshold for cloture on an Executive resolution for en bloc consideration of nominations with a calendar number on the Executive Calendar, other than those on level 1 of the Executive Schedule under 5 U.S.C. 5312, or Article 3 judges not sustained by Yea-Nay Vote. 45 - 53. Record Vote Number: 515. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Motion by Senator Thune to appeal the ruling of the chair that the threshold for cloture on an Executive resolution for en bloc consideration of nominations with a calendar number on the Executive Calendar, other than those on level 1 of the Executive Schedule under 5 U.S.C. 5312 or. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Ruling of the Chair that the point of order raised by Senator Thune with respect to the precedent set on November 21, 2013 regarding the threshold for cloture on an Executive resolution for en bloc consideration of nominations with a calendar number on the Executive Calendar, other than those on level 1 of the Executive Schedule under 5 U.S.C. 5312, or Article 3 judges, ruled out of order. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Point of order by Senator Thune that consistent with the precedent of the Senate on November 21, 2013, the threshold for cloture on an Executive resolution for en bloc consideration of nominations with a calendar number on the Executive Calendar, other than those on Level 1 of the Executive Schedule under 5 U.S.C. 5312, or Article 3 judges, is a simple majority raised in Senate. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Motion by Senator Thune to reconsider the vote by which cloture on S. Res. 377 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 513) agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 45. Record Vote Number: 514. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Motion by Senator Thune to reconsider the vote by which cloture on S. Res. 377 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 513) made in Senate. · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 Cloture not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 47. Record Vote Number: 513. (CR S6564-6565) · senate
- Sep 11, 2025 By unanimous consent agreement, mandatory quorum required under Rule XXII waived. · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 Cloture motion on the measure presented in Senate. (CR S6462) · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S6461) · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 Motion to proceed to executive session to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 45. Record Vote Number: 511. · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 Motion to table the point of order made by Senator Schumer, the question being: Is a resolution for the en bloc consideration of specific nominations on the Executive Calendar required to be considered in legislative session? agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 53 - 46. Record Vote Number: 510. · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 The Chair, under the provisions of Rule XX, submits the question to the Senate for its decision: Is a resolution for the en bloc consideration of specific nominations on the Executive Calendar required to be considered in legislative session?. · senate
- Sep 9, 2025 Point of order by Senator Schumer that the motion to proceed to Executive Session to consider Executive Calendar No. 1, S.Res. 377, is not in order because legislation that provides for the en bloc consideration of individual nominations is legislative business and should be considered in legislative session raised in Senate. · senate
- Sep 8, 2025 Placed on Senate Executive Calendar under Over, Under the Rule. Calendar No. 1. · senate
- Sep 8, 2025 Submitted in the Senate. Placed on Senate Executive Calendar under Over, Under the Rule. · senate
- Sep 8, 2025 Introduced in Senate
How your representatives voted
Sign in to see how your own representatives voted on SRES 377.
Roll-call votes (7)
How the chamber voted on this bill — the outcome, the tally by party, and every member's recorded position. A factual record.
- On the ResolutionResolution Agreed to
51 Yea · 44 Nay · 5 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea4Nay
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea0Nay1NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
Not voting(1)
- On the Cloture MotionCloture Motion Agreed to
53 Yea · 43 Nay · 4 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea3Nay1NV
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea1Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
Not voting(1)
- On the Decision of the ChairDecision of Chair Not Sustained
45 Yea · 53 Nay · 2 Not voting
- Democrats3Yea0Nay1NV
- Republicans0Yea3Nay
- Independents1Yea0Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
Not voting(1)
- On the Motion to ReconsiderMotion to Reconsider Agreed to
52 Yea · 45 Nay · 3 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea3Nay1NV
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea1Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
Not voting(1)
- On the Cloture MotionCloture Motion Rejected
52 Yea · 47 Nay · 1 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea4Nay
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea1Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
- On the Motion to ProceedMotion to Proceed Agreed to
53 Yea · 45 Nay · 2 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea4Nay
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea1Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
- On the Motion to TableMotion to Table Agreed to
53 Yea · 46 Nay · 1 Not voting
- Democrats0Yea4Nay
- Republicans3Yea0Nay
- Independents0Yea1Nay
The party tally and member list below cover the 8 of 100 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (8)
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
September 8, 2025
Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to lie over, under the rule
Comments