S 866 Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Accelerating Broadband Permits Act
To require executive agencies to take steps to better meet the statutory deadline for processing communications use applications, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill requires executive agencies to improve their tracking and processing of communications use permit applications that are subject to a 270-day statutory deadline. Agencies must develop systems to accurately track processing times, analyze factors causing delays, take corrective actions, and provide annual reports to Congress on delay factors. The bill also requires agencies to establish methods to alert employees when applications are at risk of missing the deadline. Additionally, it adds broadband infrastructure projects requiring more than $5 million in investment to the list of projects subject to NEPA environmental review.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] (R-SD)
2 cosponsors
- Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY] (R-WY)
- Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM] (D-NM)
Actions (2)
- Mar 5, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S1581) · senate
- Mar 5, 2025 Introduced in Senate
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 5, 2025
Mr. Thune (for himself, Mr. Lujan, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
A BILL
To require executive agencies to take steps to better meet the statutory deadline for processing communications use applications, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Accelerating Broadband Permits Act”.
SEC. 2. TRACKING AND IMPROVING PROCESSING TIMES FOR COMMUNICATIONS USE APPLICATIONS.
Section 6409(b)(3) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1455(b)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(E) Tracking and improving processing times.—
“(i) Data controls.—An executive agency shall develop controls to ensure that data is sufficiently accurate and complete to track the processing time for each application described in subparagraph (A).
“(ii) Requirement to analyze, address, and report on delay factors.—With respect to the factors that contribute to delays in processing applications described in subparagraph (A), an executive agency shall—
“(I) analyze the factors as the delays are occurring;
“(II) take actions to address the factors; and
“(III) provide an annual report on the factors to— “(aa) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; “(bb) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate;
“(cc) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives;
“(dd) the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives; and “(ee) each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the executive agency.
“(iii) Method for alerting staff to at- risk applications.—An executive agency shall establish a method to alert employees of the executive agency to any application described in subparagraph (A) with respect to which the executive agency is at risk of failing to meet the 270-day deadline under that subparagraph.”.
SEC. 3. MINIMUM BROADBAND PROJECT COST.
Section 41001(6)(A) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 4370m(6)(A)) is amended—
(1) in clause (iii), by striking “or” at the end;
(2) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (v); and
(3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following:
“(iv)(I) is subject to NEPA;
“(II) involves the construction of infrastructure for broadband; and
“(III) is likely to require a total investment of more than $5,000,000; or”. <all>
Comments