Skip to main content
CivicGate

S 64
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

A bill to direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jan 9, 2025

Latest action (Jan 9, 2025) Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Summary

  • Directs the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia within 180 days of enactment.
  • Expresses that Fairlawn and the city of Radford currently share the same ZIP Codes, causing sales tax revenue from electronic commerce to be misallocated.
  • Recognizes that Virginia's independent cities have separate revenue and tax practices from surrounding counties.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

1 cosponsor

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Mark R. Warner’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • CAPITAL GROUP $50,000
  • THE BOEING COMPANY $40,000
  • BLACKROCK $32,400
  • APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT $24,700
  • C3 AI $18,300

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Mark R. Warner → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Jan 9, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. · senate
  2. Jan 9, 2025 Introduced in Senate

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 9, 2025

Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for Fairlawn, Virginia, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIP CODE FOR FAIRLAWN, VIRGINIA.

(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Commonwealth of Virginia is the only State in the United States where all cities are independent from their surrounding counties;

(2) these independent cities are not politically a part of the surrounding counties, even if they are located within their borders;

(3) in Virginia these independent cities are subject to separate revenue collection and distribution practices related to roads, resources, and sales tax than neighboring counties;

(4) the sales tax collected from electronic commerce from the unincorporated community of Fairlawn, Virginia, located in Pulaski County, is often misallocated to the independent city of Radford, Virginia, because they share the same ZIP Codes; and

(5) Fairlawn, Virginia, should be eligible to obtain a separate and unique ZIP Code from the neighboring independent city of Radford, Virginia, for tax purposes.

(b) ZIP Code Designation.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to Fairlawn, Virginia. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…