S 4572 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act
To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of carriage, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill prohibits Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses and joint-action waivers in contracts of carriage for consumer and civil rights disputes. The bill defines consumer disputes as any disputes between Amtrak and customers regarding services, accommodations, or carriage, and civil rights disputes as disputes arising from alleged violations of constitutional or federal, state, or local anti-discrimination laws. The bill declares all predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers invalid and unenforceable with respect to these types of disputes between Amtrak and customers. The bill requires that courts, rather than arbitrators, determine whether the law applies to a particular agreement and whether the arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable. The law takes effect immediately upon enactment and applies to disputes arising on or after the enactment date, with an exception for disputes governed by the Railway Labor Act.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
10 cosponsors
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] (D-NJ)
- Sen. Fetterman, John [D-PA] (D-PA)
- Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI] (D-HI)
- Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA] (D-MA)
- Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR] (D-OR)
- Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT] (I-VT)
- Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD] (D-MD)
- Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA] (D-MA)
- Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI] (D-RI)
- Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR] (D-OR)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Richard Blumenthal’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT $9,500
- FREEPOINT COMMODITIES LLC $6,600
- ALIX PARTNERS $6,600
- PALANTIR $6,600
- KRUX INC. $6,600
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Richard Blumenthal → · Outside spending →
Actions (2)
- May 19, 2026 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. · senate
- May 19, 2026 Introduced in Senate
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 19, 2026
Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Booker, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Warren, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Fetterman, and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
A BILL
To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit Amtrak from including mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of carriage, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act”.
SEC. 2. NO VALIDITY OR ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS FOR CONSUMER AND CIVIL RIGHTS DISPUTES.
(a) In General.—Chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “Sec. 24324. Prohibition on mandatory arbitration
“(a) Purposes.—The purposes of this section are—
“(1) to prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers of Amtrak; and
“(2) to prohibit agreements and practices that interfere with the right of customers to participate in a joint, class, or collective action related to consumer and civil rights disputes between Amtrak and customers of Amtrak.
“(b) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) Amtrak.—The term ‘Amtrak’ means the National Railroad Passenger Corporation.
“(2) Civil rights dispute.—The term ‘civil rights dispute’ means a dispute—
“(A) arising from an alleged violation of—
“(i) the Constitution of the United States or the constitution of a State; or
“(ii) any Federal, State, or local law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of—
“(I) race, sex, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or national origin; or
“(II) any legally protected status in education, employment, credit, housing, public accommodations and facilities, voting, veterans and servicemembers, health care, or a program funded or conducted by the Federal Government or a State government, including any law referred to or described in section 62(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including parts of such law not explicitly referenced in such section that relate to protecting individuals on any such basis; and
“(B) in which at least 1 party alleging a violation described in subparagraph (A) consists of 1 or more customers (or their authorized representative), including 1 or more individuals seeking certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a comparable rule or provision of State law.
“(3) Consumer dispute.—The term ‘consumer dispute’ means any dispute, including all claims related to personal injuries, between Amtrak and 1 or more customers who seek or acquire—
“(A) services and accommodations provided by Amtrak; or
“(B) carriage on Amtrak trains and equipment.
“(4) Customer.—The term ‘customer’ means any individual, except for an employee of Amtrak and without regard to whether the individual is a minor or paid for the transportation, who seeks or acquires—
“(A) services and accommodations provided by Amtrak; or
“(B) carriage on Amtrak trains and equipment.
“(5) Predispute arbitration agreement.—The term ‘predispute arbitration agreement’ means an agreement to arbitrate a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
“(6) Predispute joint-action waiver.—The term ‘predispute joint-action waiver’ means an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, which would prohibit, or waive the right of, 1 of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.
“(7) Rail passenger carrier.—The term ‘rail passenger carrier’ means a rail carrier providing—
“(A) intercity rail passenger transportation (as such term is defined in section 24102); or
“(B) interstate or intrastate high-speed rail (as such term is defined in section 26105) transportation, excluding a tourist, historic, scenic, or excursion rail carrier.
“(c) In General.—
“(1) In general.—All predispute arbitration agreements and predispute joint-action waivers shall be invalid and unenforceable with respect to a consumer or civil rights dispute between Amtrak (in its capacity as a rail passenger carrier) and a customer of Amtrak.
“(2) Applicability.—
“(A) In general.—A determination of whether this section applies to a particular dispute shall be made in accordance with Federal law.
“(B) Authority of court.—The applicability of this section to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which this section applies shall be determined by a court, rather than by an arbitrator, regardless of whether—
“(i) the party resisting arbitration challenges the arbitration agreement specifically or in conjunction with other terms of the contract containing such agreement; and
“(ii) the agreement purports to delegate such determinations to an arbitrator.
“(C) Exclusion.—Nothing in this section may be construed to apply to a predispute arbitration agreement or joint-action waiver invoked in connection with any dispute subject to the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.).”.
(b) Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a)—
(1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(2) shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after such date.
(c) Clerical Amendment.—The analysis for chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“24324. Prohibition on mandatory arbitration.”. <all>
Comments