S 3966 Passed Senate Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Summary
This bill makes nondisclosure and confidentiality clauses unenforceable when they restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of minors, whether the clauses appear in contracts made before or after the bill's enactment. Victims and alleged victims of child sexual abuse, as well as others with knowledge of such abuse, would be permitted to disclose the abuse and related facts without fear of civil liability, despite any contractual restrictions to the contrary. The bill defines sexual abuse to include conduct constituting federal crimes against minors and state crimes involving minors. Parties could still restrict disclosure of other matters in settlement agreements, such as payment amounts, as long as those restrictions do not prevent disclosure about the abuse itself. The bill supersedes any state law that would permit enforcement of nondisclosure clauses prohibited by this Act, while allowing states to enact equal or stronger protections for abuse survivors.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX] (R-TX)
20 cosponsors
- Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN] (R-TN)
- Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT] (D-CT)
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] (D-NJ)
- Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL] (R-AL)
- Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE] (D-DE)
- Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX] (R-TX)
- Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] (D-IL)
- Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY] (D-NY)
- Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC] (R-SC)
- Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA] (R-IA)
- Sen. Hawley, Josh [R-MO] (R-MO)
- Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI] (D-HI)
- Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA] (R-LA)
- Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN] (D-MN)
- Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL] (R-FL)
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA] (D-CA)
- Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO] (R-MO)
- Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH] (D-NH)
- Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC] (R-NC)
- Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT] (D-VT)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Ted Cruz’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- NULL $4,424,745
- ENTREPRENEUR $458,096
- RDV CORPORATION $39,600
- AMERICAN AIRLINES $29,632
- BLACKSTONE $27,400
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Ted Cruz → · Outside spending →
Actions (10)
- May 20, 2026 Held at the desk. · house
- May 20, 2026 Received in the House. · house
- May 20, 2026 Message on Senate action sent to the House. · senate
- May 20, 2026 Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2398-2400; text: CR S2399-2400) · senate
- May 20, 2026 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- May 19, 2026 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 413. · senate
- May 19, 2026 Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report. · senate
- May 14, 2026 Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. · senate
- Mar 3, 2026 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. · senate
- Mar 3, 2026 Introduced in Senate
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (3)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Committee action
What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.
Meetings where this bill was on the agenda
- Business meeting to consider S.3966, to prohibit the enforcement of certain contractual clauses that restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of minors, S.736, to increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a correctional facility, S.825, to require the Attorney General to propose a program for making treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder available to public safety officers, S.4394, to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to improve the COPS program with respect to training command-level personnel, S.3897, to revise administrative procedures relating to public safety officers' death benefits, S.1890, to establish a grant program for certain State and local forensic activities, S.3041, to allow the U.S. Marshals Service to assist in certain Tribal criminal matters, and the nominations of Justin D. Smith, of Missouri, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, Jeffrey M. Kuhlman, Anthony W. Mattivi, and Anthony J. Powell, each to be a United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, Timothy VerHey, to be United States Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, James Arnott, to be United States Marshal for the Western District of Missouri, Jack Chambers, to be United States Marshal for the Southern District of West Virginia, and Jason Holt, to be United States Marshal for the Northern District of Oklahoma, all of the Department of Justice.
- Business meeting to consider S.1572, to amend title 18, United States Code, to improve the Federal carjacking statute, S.3062, to require artificial intelligence chatbots to implement age verification measures and make certain disclosures, S.3966, to prohibit the enforcement of certain contractual clauses that restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of minors, S.736, to increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a correctional facility, S.825, to require the Attorney General to propose a program for making treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder available to public safety officers, S.4394, to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to improve the COPS program with respect to training command-level personnel, and the nominations of Justin D. Smith, of Missouri, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, Sheria Akins Clarke, to be United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, Jeffrey M. Kuhlman, Anthony W. Mattivi, and Anthony J. Powell, each to be a United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, Kathleen S. Lane, to be United States District Judge for the District of Montana, Evan Rikhye, to be Judge for the District Court of the Virgin Islands, Kara Marie Westercamp, of Virginia, to be a Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, and Kenneth Sorenson, to be United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii, Timothy VerHey, to be United States Attorney for the Western District of Michigan, James Arnott, to be United States Marshal for the Western District of Missouri, Jack Chambers, to be United States Marshal for the Southern District of West Virginia, Jason Holt, to be United States Marshal for the Northern District of Oklahoma, and Johnson TeeHee II, to be United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, all of the Department of Justice.
Full text
AN ACT
To prohibit the enforcement of certain contractual clauses that restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of minors, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Terminating Restrictive Enforcement of Youth Settlements Law” or “TREY’S Law”.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.
(a) Findings.—
(1) Instrumentalities of interstate commerce.—Congress finds the following:
(A) Sexual abuse of minors, including abuse facilitated through instrumentalities of interstate commerce, is a matter of national concern.
(B) Agreements containing nondisclosure and confidentiality provisions, frequently concluded through the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, have been used to silence survivors of sexual abuse and conceal ongoing or repeated abuse.
(C) The enforcement of such provisions interferes with reporting to law enforcement agencies, child protection authorities, Federal regulators, Members of Congress, and the courts, and frustrates the enforcement of Federal criminal and civil law.
(2) Necessary and proper clause and enforcement of federal criminal law.—Congress further finds the following:
(A) Sexual abuse and trafficking of minors are prohibited under Federal criminal law, including chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, and section 1591 of title 18, United States Code.
(B) Nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements that prohibit or restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of a minor interfere with reporting to law enforcement, child protection authorities, courts, Federal regulators, and Members of Congress.
(C) Such agreements frustrate the investigation and prosecution of Federal crimes, chill cooperation with law enforcement, and function as private mechanisms to obstruct justice.
(D) Congress has authority under clause 18 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States (commonly known as the “Necessary and Proper Clause”) to ensure that private agreements are not used to impede the enforcement of Federal criminal and civil law protecting minors from sexual exploitation and abuse.
(3) State action and section 5 of the 14th amendment.— Congress further finds the following:
(A) Survivors of child sexual abuse possess fundamental constitutional interests, secured by provisions of the Bill of Rights as incorporated against the States through the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in reporting crimes, seeking redress through the courts, cooperating with law enforcement, and petitioning the government for protection and enforcement.
(B) When State courts or other governmental authorities enforce nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that prohibit or restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of a minor, such enforcement constitutes State action for purposes of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
(C) Judicial enforcement of such provisions may deprive survivors of due process of law, equal protection of the laws, and meaningful access to courts, including rights derived from the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and incorporated against the States, in violation of the 14th Amendment.
(D) Agreements that obstruct justice, suppress the reporting of crimes, or conceal criminal conduct have long been regarded at common law, including at the time of the founding of the United States, as void and unenforceable as against public policy, and fall outside the traditional scope of protected contractual liberty.
(E) At the time of the founding of the United States, private agreements purporting to suppress prosecution, conceal felonies, or restrain the reporting of crimes were not recognized as valid or enforceable contracts, and no party possessed a vested right in their judicial enforcement.
(F) Congress has authority under section 5 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to enact appropriate remedial and preventive legislation to prevent and remedy constitutional violations arising from State judicial enforcement of private agreements that suppress disclosure of criminal conduct involving minors.
(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is—
(1) to enforce the guarantees of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, including the right to petition the government for redress of grievances and the right of access to courts, by preventing State courts and other governmental authorities from enforcing nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that suppress disclosure of sexual abuse of minors;
(2) to ensure, pursuant to the authority of Congress under article I of the Constitution of the United States, including the Necessary and Proper Clause, that private agreements are not used to obstruct the investigation or prosecution of Federal crimes involving the sexual abuse or trafficking of minors;
(3) to preserve access to courts and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances; and
(4) to ensure that survivors of sexual abuse of minors, and persons with knowledge of such abuse, may disclose such abuse freely and without fear of civil liability.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Minor person.—The term “minor person” means an individual who has not attained 18 years of age.
(2) Nondisclosure clause.—The term “nondisclosure clause” means a provision in a contract or agreement that prohibits 1 or more parties to the contract or agreement from disclosing conduct or information covered by the terms and conditions of the contract or agreement.
(3) Sexual abuse against a minor person.—The term “sexual abuse against a minor person” means—
(A) conduct that constitutes or allegedly constitutes—
(i) an offense under chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code; or
(ii) sex trafficking of a minor person under section 1591 of title 18, United States Code; or
(B) any sexual act or sexual contact involving a minor person that constitutes a criminal offense under Federal law or the law of the State in which the act or contact occurs.
SEC. 4. NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS VOID AND UNENFORCEABLE.
(a) In General.—A nondisclosure clause shall be void and unenforceable as against public policy only to the extent that the nondisclosure clause prohibits—
(1) a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person from disclosing—
(A) that act of sexual abuse against a minor person; or
(B) facts related to that act of sexual abuse against a minor person; or
(2) any other person from disclosing facts related to sexual abuse against a minor person described in paragraph (1) in support of, in furtherance of, or consistent with the right of a victim or alleged victim to disclose under that paragraph.
(b) Permissible Confidentiality.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a person, including a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person, from entering into a contract or agreement that restricts the disclosure of information, including the amount or payment terms of a settlement, by another party to the contract or agreement, including an alleged perpetrator, so long as such restriction does not prevent disclosure protected under subsection
(a).
SEC. 5. RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.
(a) In General.—This Act shall apply to any nondisclosure clause in a contract or agreement entered into before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) No Enforcement Actions.—No person may enforce or attempt to enforce a nondisclosure clause described in section 4(a), regardless of the date on which the contract or agreement containing the nondisclosure clause was entered into.
(c) Preemption.—
(1) In general.—This Act supersedes any State law to the extent that such law permits enforcement of a provision, the enforcement of which is prohibited under this Act.
(2) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit a State or locality from enacting legislation that—
(A) is consistent with this Act; or
(B) provides greater protection to a victim of sexual abuse against a minor person than is provided under this Act.
Passed the Senate May 20, 2026.
Attest:
Secretary. 119th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 3966
AN ACT
To prohibit the enforcement of certain contractual clauses that restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of minors, and for other purposes.
Comments