S 2977 Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to ensure timely rulings by the Merit Systems Protection Board on appeals by Federal employees and applicants for employment.
Summary
This bill sets a 120-day deadline for the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to take action on appeals filed by federal employees or job applicants regarding personnel decisions. If the MSPB has not issued a ruling within 120 days, the employee or applicant may file a civil action in federal district court instead of waiting for the MSPB to complete its review. The civil action can be filed in the district where the personnel action occurred, where the employee would have worked, or where the agency's principal office is located. When a civil action is filed, the MSPB must pause its appeal; if the court dismisses the civil action for lack of jurisdiction, the MSPB resumes processing the appeal.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
13 cosponsors
- Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD] (D-MD)
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] (D-NJ)
- Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL] (D-IL)
- Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA] (D-VA)
- Sen. Kim, Andy [D-NJ] (D-NJ)
- Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA] (D-MA)
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA] (D-CA)
- Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI] (D-MI)
- Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI] (D-RI)
- Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI] (D-HI)
- Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA] (D-CA)
- Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD] (D-MD)
- Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA] (D-VA)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Richard Blumenthal’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT $9,500
- FREEPOINT COMMODITIES LLC $6,600
- ALIX PARTNERS $6,600
- PALANTIR $6,600
- KRUX INC. $6,600
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Richard Blumenthal → · Outside spending →
Actions (2)
- Oct 7, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. · senate
- Oct 7, 2025 Introduced in Senate
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 7, 2025
Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Alsobrooks, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Warner, Mr. Peters, Mr. Kim, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Reed, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Padilla, and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
A BILL
To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to ensure timely rulings by the Merit Systems Protection Board on appeals by Federal employees and applicants for employment.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Fair Access to Swift and Timely Justice Act” or the “FAST Justice Act”.
SEC. 2. TIMELINESS OF MSPB APPEALS.
(a) In General.—Section 7701 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (k) as subsection (l); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (j) the following:
“(k) Untimely Action by MSPB.—
“(1) In general.—On and after the date that is 120 days after the date on which an employee or applicant for employment files an appeal under this section, other than an appeal of a case that is subject to section 7702, if the Merit Systems Protection Board has not taken an action with respect to the appeal that is subject to judicial review, the employee or applicant shall be entitled to file a civil action with respect to the personnel action that is the subject of the appeal.
“(2) Filing.—
“(A) In general.—An employee or applicant may bring a civil action under paragraph (1) in a district court of the United States for—
“(i) any judicial district in which a personnel action that is a subject of the civil action is alleged to have occurred; or
“(ii) the judicial district in which the employee or applicant would have been employed, but for a personnel action that is a subject of the civil action.
“(B) Where principal office is located.—If the respondent for a civil action under paragraph (1) is not subject to personal jurisdiction in any judicial district described in subparagraph (A), the civil action may be brought in a district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the principal office of the respondent is located.
“(3) Standards for judicial review.—In a civil action under paragraph (1), the court—
“(A) shall apply the standard of review under section 7703(c) only with respect to an order or decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board; and
“(B) in making any other determination, shall apply the same standard of review that would have applied to the review of the personnel action at issue by the Merit Systems Protection Board.
“(4) Appeal of district court determination.—An appeal from an order or decision of the district court in a civil action under paragraph (1) shall, in accordance with section 1291 of title 28, be filed with the court of appeals of the United States for the judicial district in which the district court is located.
“(5) Stay.—If an employee or applicant for employment brings a civil action in accordance with paragraph (1) with respect to a personnel action, the Merit Systems Protection Board—
“(A) shall stay the appeal relating to the personnel action upon the filing of the civil action; and
“(B) if the civil action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, shall resume processing the appeal.”.
(b) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in the amendments made by subsection (a) shall be construed to limit the ability of an employee or applicant for employment to obtain judicial review of an order or decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in accordance with section 7703 of title 5, United States Code. <all>
Comments