S 2934 Passed Senate Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025
Summary
- Prohibits foreign persons from suing in U.S. courts to enforce foreign judgments or arbitral awards if the claim resulted from compliance with U.S. sanctions
- Prohibits enforcement of foreign judgments where the foreign court relied on U.S. sanctions or export controls to assert jurisdiction
- Requires U.S. courts to dismiss any lawsuits to enforce such foreign judgments or awards
- Preserves certain legal rights including those of international terrorism victims and parties with U.S.-based contractual dispute agreements
- Applies to all lawsuits pending on or after the enactment date
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX] (R-TX)
1 cosponsor
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA] (D-CA)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to John Cornyn’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- CAPITAL GROUP $22,500
- ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ $16,500
- PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES $13,686
- WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT $13,200
- BLACKSTONE $12,600
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for John Cornyn → · Outside spending →
Actions (10)
- May 4, 2026 Held at the desk. · house
- May 4, 2026 Received in the House. · house
- May 1, 2026 Message on Senate action sent to the House. · senate
- Apr 28, 2026 Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2073-2074; text: CR S2073-2074) · senate
- Apr 28, 2026 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Mar 26, 2026 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 367. · senate
- Mar 26, 2026 Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report. · senate
- Mar 26, 2026 Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. · senate
- Sep 29, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. · senate
- Sep 29, 2025 Introduced in Senate
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (3)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Committee action
What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.
Meetings where this bill was on the agenda
- Business meeting to consider S.545, to prohibit certain uses of xylazine, H.R.2159, to direct the Attorney General of the United States to submit to the Congress a report on Federal criminal offenses, S.2934, to limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions, and the nominations of Brian Gootkin, to be United States Marshal for the District of Montana, and James Stuart, to be United States Marshal for the District of Minnesota.
- Business meeting to consider S.545, to prohibit certain uses of xylazine, H.R.2159, to direct the Attorney General of the United States to submit to the Congress a report on Federal criminal offenses, S.2934, to limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions, and the nominations of Colin McDonald, of California, to be an Assistant Attorney General, James Bishop, to be United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina, Brian Barber, to be United States Marshal for the Western District of Louisiana, Steven Lewis, to be United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Missouri, Priscilla Lopez, to be United States Marshal for the Southern District of Florida, Brian Gootkin, to be United States Marshal for the District of Montana, and James Stuart, to be United States Marshal for the District of Minnesota, all of the Department of Justice.
Full text
AN ACT
To limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Protecting Americans from Russian Litigation Act of 2025”.
SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY.
It is the policy of the United States—
(1) to ensure that United States persons are not disadvantaged for actions or omissions undertaken to comply with United States sanctions or export controls; and
(2) to ensure that foreign persons, or persons acting on their behalf, cannot obtain compensation for any action related to United States persons attempting in good faith to comply with their obligations under United States sanctions or export controls.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON CIVIL ACTIONS AFFECTED BY UNITED STATES SANCTIONS.
(a) In General.—Chapter 111 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “Sec. 1660. Limitation on civil actions affected by United States sanctions
“(a) Limitation.—Notwithstanding any provision of law, no person (other than the United States or a person acting on behalf of the United States) may bring a civil action in Federal or State court to enforce any foreign judgment or foreign arbitral award arising from a claim where—
“(1) the underlying conduct or circumstances giving rise to the claim resulted from actions to comply with United States sanctions impeding the performance of a contract; or
“(2) the court or tribunal issuing the judgment or arbitral award asserted jurisdiction based, in whole or in part, on the imposition of United States sanctions or export controls (or any foreign law enacted in response to the imposition of United States sanctions or export controls).
“(b) Removal and Dismissal.—An action to recognize or enforce a foreign judgment or foreign arbitral award described in subsection (a) may be removed by any defendant to the appropriate United States district court, which shall dismiss the action.
“(c) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed to limit—
“(1) the authority of the President, any delegate of the President (including the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury), or any other officer or official of the United States to bring any action or exercise any responsibility under any applicable State or Federal law;
“(2) any right, remedy, or cause of action available to a victim of international terrorism, torture, extrajudicial killing, aircraft sabotage, or hostage taking, who is, or was at the time of the victim’s injury, a national of the United States, a member of the United States Armed Forces, an employee of the United States Government, or an individual performing a contract awarded by the United States Government acting within the scope of the individual’s employment, or a family member of any such victim, under any applicable State or Federal law, including—
“(A) chapter 97 of this title;
“(B) chapter 113B of title 18; and
“(C) the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.) and any other laws providing for the application of sanctions with respect to Iran or Syria;
“(3) any right, remedy, or cause of action available to any party arising under or relating to the party’s contractual rights (other than an action to enforce a foreign judgment or foreign arbitral award described in subsection (a)) where the parties agreed to resolve all disputes by litigation in a State or Federal court within the United States or by arbitration within the United States; or
“(4) any other right, remedy, or cause of action available to any party arising under State or Federal law (other than an action to enforce a foreign judgment or foreign arbitral award described in subsection (a)) where the underlying conduct or circumstances giving rise to the claim resulted from the imposition of United States sanctions or export controls.
“(d) United States Sanctions Defined.—In this section:
“(1) In general.—The term ‘United States sanctions’ means any prohibition, restriction, or condition on transactions involving any property in which any foreign country or national thereof has any interest that is imposed by the United States to address threats to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States pursuant to—
“(A) section 203 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702); or
“(B) any other provision of law, including any provision of law relating to export controls.
“(2) Duties.—The term ‘United States sanctions’ does not include the imposition of a duty on the importation of goods.”.
(b) Clerical Amendment.—The table of sections for such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1659 the following new item:
“1660. Limitation on civil actions affected by United States sanctions.”.
(c) Application.—Section 1660 of title 28, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), applies with respect to civil actions pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Passed the Senate April 28, 2026.
Attest:
Secretary. 119th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2934
AN ACT
To limit the availability of civil actions affected by United States sanctions.
Comments