S 2204 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Protecting America’s Diplomatic Workforce Act
To increase transparency, fairness, and protections for diplomatic personnel affected by reductions in force, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill establishes new protections and transparency requirements for reductions in force (layoffs) affecting diplomatic personnel at seven federal agencies including the State Department, USAID, and the Peace Corps. It limits these agencies to separating no more than 50 employees through reductions in force during any six-month period, unless the agency provides Congress with detailed justification at least 20 days in advance. The bill requires agencies to demonstrate they have exhausted alternatives and assess the impact on diplomatic missions and national competitiveness. It also modifies Foreign Service reduction in force procedures to base decisions primarily on performance, require 120 days' advance notice to employees, and establish a worldwide competitive area for Foreign Service positions. Additionally, the bill requires the State Department to notify Congress 30 days in advance of any changes to the Foreign Affairs Manual.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH] (D-NH)
9 cosponsors
- Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ] (D-NJ)
- Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE] (D-DE)
- Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL] (D-IL)
- Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA] (D-VA)
- Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR] (D-OR)
- Sen. Murphy, Christopher [D-CT] (D-CT)
- Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV] (D-NV)
- Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI] (D-HI)
- Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD] (D-MD)
Actions (2)
- Jun 28, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. · senate
- Jun 28, 2025 Introduced in Senate
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 28, 2025
Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Booker, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Duckworth, and Ms. Rosen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
A BILL
To increase transparency, fairness, and protections for diplomatic personnel affected by reductions in force, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Protecting America’s Diplomatic Workforce Act”.
SEC. 2. IMPROVED TRANSPARENCY AND JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SIGNIFICANT REDUCTIONS IN FORCE.
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), during any 6-month period, a covered agency may not separate more than 50 employees from service pursuant to 1 or more reductions in force.
(b) Requirements.—A covered agency may separate more than 50 employees from service pursuant to 1 or more reductions in force during a 6-month period only if, before carrying out the reduction in force that would cause the covered agency to violate subsection (a), the covered agency—
(1) not later than 20 days before submitting a notice of the reduction in force to affected employees, submits to the appropriate congressional committees of jurisdiction a detailed explanation of the reduction in force that includes—
(A) the steps the covered agency has taken to exhaust all other options before carrying out the proposed reduction in force, including whether the covered agency considered reassigning the employees to an equivalent position;
(B) the justification for the reduction in force;
(C) an assessment of whether the proposed reduction in force will negatively impact the covered agency’s ability to carry out its mission and obligations required by statute;
(D) an assessment of how the proposed reduction in force will affect United States diplomatic presence and engagement and the United States ability to compete with adversaries; and
(E) with respect to employees in the civil service, information about how the covered agency has complied with—
(i) subchapter I of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code; and
(ii) part 351 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation); and
(2) briefs the appropriate congressional committees of jurisdiction on the justification for the reduction in force and the other criteria described in paragraph (1).
SEC. 3. FOREIGN SERVICE REDUCTION IN FORCE PROCEDURES.
(a) In General.—Section 611 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4010a) is amended—
(1) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
“(a) Authorization.—The Secretary may conduct reductions in force for the separation of members of the Service holding a career or career candidate appointment under chapter 3 of this Act for reasons such as reorganization or shortage of funds.”;
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections
(e) and (f), respectively;
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:
“(b) Competitive Area.—The competitive area for a reduction in force shall be worldwide, with employees of the same rank and cone or specialist competing against each other for retention.
“(c) Criteria.—Reduction in force procedures shall be designed to ensure that determinations are based primarily on performance as determined by previous selection board rankings. Tenure of employment, language capabilities, and military preference, subject to section 3501(a)(3) of title 5, United States Code, shall also be considered.
“(d) Required Notice.—Absent unforeseen circumstances, employees shall be given 120 days’ advance notice of separation. In no case shall employees be given less than 60 days’ advance notice.
“(e) Protections.—Foreign Service employees shall be afforded the same protections afforded to career members of the civil service under section 3503 of title 5, United States Code, in the event of a transfer of function.”; and
(4) in subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: “The Foreign Service Grievances Board shall have the same authority as the Merit Systems Protection Board to adjudicate reduction in force grievances.”.
(b) Management Rights.—Section 1005(a)(3) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4105(a)(3)) is amended by striking “, and to prescribe regulations for the separation of employees pursuant to such reductions in force conducted under section 611”.
SEC. 4. REDUCTION IN FORCE NOTICE PERIOD.
The notice period for a reduction in force pursuant to section 3502 of title 5, United States Code, at a covered agency shall be 60 days.
SEC. 5. FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL CHANGES.
Section 5318 of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2021 (22 U.S.C. 2658a) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “5 years” and inserting “8 years”; and
(2) adding at the end the following:
“(d) Notice; Consultation; Briefing.—Before effectuating any changes in the Foreign Affairs Manual, the Secretary of State shall—
“(1) provide notice to, and consult with, the appropriate congressional committees in writing, not later than 30 days before such changes are scheduled to take effect; and
“(2) provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees regarding the proposed changes.”.
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Appropriate congressional committees.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2) Covered agency.—The term “covered agency” means—
(A) the Department of State;
(B) the United States Agency for International Development;
(C) the Millennium Challenge Corporation;
(D) the United States International Development Finance Corporation;
(E) the Peace Corps;
(F) the United States Trade and Development Agency; and
(G) the United States Agency for Global Media and its networks. <all>
Comments