Skip to main content
CivicGate

S 179
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

FARM Act

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prevent harm and disruption to the United States agriculture industry by protecting against foreign influence over agriculture production and supply chains, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jan 22, 2025

Latest action (Jan 22, 2025) Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Summary

This bill would expand the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to include the Secretary of Agriculture and give CFIUS authority to review foreign transactions involving U.S. agriculture businesses. Agricultural systems and supply chains would be designated as critical infrastructure and critical technologies subject to CFIUS scrutiny. The bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture and Comptroller General to report to Congress within one year on foreign investments and influence in U.S. agriculture, including potential threats and espionage risks.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Tommy Tuberville’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $68,223
  • BEASLEY ALLEN $19,800
  • RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES $13,782
  • BEASLEY ALLEN LAW FIRM $13,200
  • LEWIS M. CARTER MANUFACTURING COMPANY $12,100

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Tommy Tuberville → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Jan 22, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. · senate
  2. Jan 22, 2025 Introduced in Senate

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 22, 2025

Mr. Tuberville (for himself, Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Marshall, Mrs. Britt, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. Sheehy, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prevent harm and disruption to the United States agriculture industry by protecting against foreign influence over agriculture production and supply chains, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Foreign Adversary Risk Management Act” or the “FARM Act”.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE INCLUDED IN COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

(a) Agriculture Representative.—Section 721(k)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(k)(2)) is amended—

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (H), (I), and (J) as subparagraphs (I), (J), and (K), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:

“(H) The Secretary of Agriculture.”.

(b) Review of Agriculture Investments by Foreign Entities.—Section 721(a)(4) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(4)) is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (A)—

(A) in clause (i), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon;

(B) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

(C) by adding at the end the following:

“(iii) any transaction described in subparagraph (B)(vi) that is proposed, pending, or completed on or after the date of the enactment of the Foreign Adversary Risk Management Act.”; and

(2) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following:

“(vi) Any transaction, merger, acquisition, transfer, agreement, takeover, or other arrangement that could result in foreign control of any United States business that is engaged in agriculture and uses agricultural products (as defined in the first section of the Act of July 2, 1926 (44 Stat. 802, chapter 725; 7 U.S.C. 451)).”.

(c) Agricultural Supply Chains Included in Critical Infrastructure.—Section 721(a)(5) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(5)) is amended—

(1) by striking “‘critical infrastructure’ means” and inserting the following: “‘critical infrastructure’—

“(A) means”;

(2) by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

(3) by adding at the end the following:

“(B) includes, subject to regulations prescribed by the Committee, agricultural systems and supply chains.”.

(d) Agricultural Supply Chains Included as Critical Technologies.— Section 721(a)(6)(A) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4565(a)(6)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(vii) Agricultural supply chains used for agricultural products (as defined in the first section of the Act of July 2, 1926 (44 Stat. 802, chapter 725; 7 U.S.C. 451)).”.

SEC. 3. REPORTS ON INVESTMENTS BY FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE INDUSTRY.

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture and the Comptroller General of the United States shall each—

(1) conduct an analysis of foreign influence in the United States agriculture industry; and

(2) submit to Congress a report that includes a summary of—

(A) foreign investments in the United States agriculture industry;

(B) the potential for foreign investment to undermine United States agriculture production and agricultural supply chains;

(C) the largest international threats for increased foreign control of, and investment in, the United States agriculture sector; and

(D) agriculture-related espionage and theft techniques used by foreign governments, including any attempts to target United States agricultural intellectual property, innovation, research and development, cost or pricing data, or internal strategy documents. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…