S 148 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To prohibit the use of non-monetized or unqualified factors for regulatory analyses, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill would prohibit federal agencies from using non-monetized or unquantified factors when conducting regulatory impact and benefit-cost analyses for proposed, final, or interim final rules. It would require agencies to publish summaries and full texts of all regulatory analyses with each rule, including detailed methodology and economic impact calculations, along with information about the agency's decision-making processes. The Office of Management and Budget would be prohibited from authorizing or considering non-monetized factors in regulatory analyses and would be required to issue revised guidance within 90 days to ensure agency compliance. The bill would allow individuals or entities affected by a rule to sue in federal court if an agency violated this prohibition, with courts able to invalidate rules found to have relied on non-monetized factors. The provision would apply retroactively to rules issued on or after November 9, 2023, and would take effect 30 days after enactment.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA] (R-IA)
1 cosponsor
- Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK] (R-OK)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Joni Ernst’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- NULL $57,653
- CAPITAL GROUP $40,000
- SOROBAN CAPITAL $13,200
- CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES $7,500
- GOOGLE $6,800
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Joni Ernst → · Outside spending →
Actions (3)
- Nov 19, 2025 Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held. · senate
- Jan 17, 2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. · senate
- Jan 17, 2025 Introduced in Senate
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 17, 2025
Ms. Ernst (for herself and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
A BILL
To prohibit the use of non-monetized or unqualified factors for regulatory analyses, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Regulations Evaluated to Determine The Anticipated Price and Effect Act” or the “RED TAPE Act”.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that agencies must prioritize tangible, immediately quantifiable monetary benefits in their decision making processes, ensuring regulatory actions yield clear and measurable financial benefits to the public and private sectors while minimizing unnecessary regulatory costs or burdens.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON NET BENEFIT DISCOUNTS; CONSIDERATION OF REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSES.
(a) In General.—Chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in section 601—
(A) in paragraph (6), by striking “and” at the end;
(B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(8) the term ‘benefit-cost analysis’ has the meaning given the term in Office of Management and Budget Circular A- 94, as revised on November 9, 2023, or any successor revision; and
“(9) the term ‘regulatory impact analysis’ means a regulatory analysis described in—
“(A) Executive Order 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory planning and review);
“(B) Executive Order 13563 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to improving regulation and regulatory review);
“(C) Executive Order 14094 (88 Fed. Reg. 21879; relating to modernizing regulatory review);
“(D) Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-4, as revised on November 9, 2023, or any successor revision; or
“(E) Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-94, as revised on November 9, 2023, or any successor revision.”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following: “Sec. 613. Prohibition on use of non-monetized or unqualified factors for regulatory analyses
“(a) Agency Prohibition.—An agency may not consider any non- monetized or unquantified factor when conducting a regulatory impact analysis or benefit-cost analysis on any proposed rule, final rule, or interim final rule.
“(b) OMB Prohibition.—The Office of Management and Budget may not—
“(1) authorize in any manner, such as in issuing guidance, a memorandum, a directive, or a rule that permit or endorse the analysis or use of any non-monetized or unquantified factor when conducting a regulatory impact analysis or benefit-cost analysis on any proposed rule, final rule, or interim final rule; or
“(2) consider any non-monetized or unquantified factor presented in a regulatory impact analysis or benefit-cost analysis of another agency.
“(c) Public Transparency.—Each agency shall publish in the Federal Register, with respect to and along with each proposed rule, final rule, or interim final rule—
“(1) a summary of each regulatory impact analysis and benefit-cost analysis conducted by the agency;
“(2) the text of each regulatory impact analysis and benefit-cost analysis conducted by the agency, including a disclosure of the methodology and specific analyses used by the agency in estimating economic impacts, and the determination and rationale of such economic impact analyses; and
“(3) any additional information of the agency relevant to the regulatory impact and benefit-cost analyses conducted by the agency, such as the decision-making processes of the agency.
“(d) Regulatory Guidance.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue revised guidance to agencies to ensure compliance with the provisions of this section.
“(e) Judicial Review.—
“(1) In general.—Any party affected by a rule issued by an agency that considered a non-monetized or unquantified factor when conducting a regulatory impact or benefit-cost analysis in violation of this section may bring a civil action against the agency to challenge the rule in a district court of the United States.
“(2) Invalidation of regulation.—If the court finds that an agency relied upon non-monetized or unquantified factors to evaluate a final rule or interim final rule in contravention of this section, the court shall declare the rule invalid.
“(3) Statute of limitations.—This subsection shall apply with respect to any rule issued by an agency on or after November 9, 2023.”.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.—The table of sections for chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“613. Prohibition on use of non-monetized or unquantified factors for regulatory analyses.”.
SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendments made by section 3 shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act. <all>
Comments