Skip to main content
CivicGate

HRES 967
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that European laws and regulations unfairly and unreasonably burden American speech and innovation.

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that European laws and regulations unfairly and unreasonably burden American speech and innovation.

Introduced Dec 18, 2025

Latest action (Dec 18, 2025) Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Policy area
Issues
Foreign Policy

Summary

This resolution expresses the House's disapproval of certain European digital regulations, including the European Union's Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act and the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act and related laws. The resolution calls on the Trump administration to use diplomatic and economic means to protect American free speech rights and innovation from what it characterizes as unfair foreign regulations. It also calls on the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission to reject the antitrust principles underlying these European laws and not cooperate with European governments in enforcing them.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Jefferson Van Drew’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $176,557
  • ENTREPRENEUR $70,972
  • PULSE VASCULAR $9,900
  • ICONA RESORTS $9,900
  • MONZO CATANESE HILLEGASS $9,000

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Jefferson Van Drew → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Dec 18, 2025 Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. · house
  2. Dec 18, 2025 Submitted in House

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 18, 2025

Mr. Van Drew (for himself, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Fitzgerald, and Mr. Hunt) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that European laws and regulations unfairly and unreasonably burden American speech and innovation.

Whereas the right to express oneself freely under the First Amendment to the Constitution is at the very core of democracy in the United States; Whereas labels like “misinformation” and “hate speech” are inevitably used by the powerful to censor critics and silence dissent; Whereas oversight by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives has shown that the Biden administration coerced and colluded with social media companies to censor First Amendment-protected discourse related to elections and the COVID-19 pandemic; Whereas both Meta and Alphabet informed the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives that the Biden administration successfully pressured them to censor First Amendment-protected content on their platforms; Whereas the American people resoundingly rejected this censorship and reinforced fundamental free speech principles in the 2024 election; Whereas the European Union, its member states, and the United Kingdom have enacted comprehensive digital regulations that violate due process, punish American companies, and censor legitimate political discourse; Whereas European digital censorship laws set de facto international standards for content moderation; Whereas European and British officials have explicitly used these laws to target First Amendment-protected political discourse by and among United States citizens; Whereas European digital regulations impose significant costs on American companies, harming American workers and consumers; Whereas European digital regulations violate the due process rights of American companies to administer fines and penalties that amount to targeted trade barriers against Americans; Whereas European digital regulations are designed specifically to target United States companies while leaving European competitors free from burdensome requirements; and Whereas European regulations function as a tax on American innovators, distorting the free market and free exchange of ideas to fund Europe’s bloated welfare state: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses disapproval of the European Union’s Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act, the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act and Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act, and similar foreign laws;

(2) calls on the Trump administration to use diplomatic and economic tools to protect the free expression rights of United States citizens and prevent foreign governments from undermining the freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution;

(3) calls on the Trump administration to use diplomatic and economic tools to protect American innovation and prevent foreign antitrust authorities from harming United States consumers and companies;

(4) calls on the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission to reject the antitrust principles underlying the European Union’s Digital Markets Act and the United Kingdom’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act; and

(5) calls on the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission not to cooperate with European governments in the enforcement of these or any other similar foreign antitrust laws. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…