HRES 1075 Passed House Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117–169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
H. RES. 1075 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
Summary
This resolution provides the procedural framework for House floor consideration of two bills related to energy policy. The first bill (H.R. 4626) would amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to require that energy conservation standards be technologically feasible and economically justified. The second bill (H.R. 4758) would repeal provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification. The resolution sets one hour of debate for each bill and one motion to recommit, and waives points of order against consideration.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
Actions (11)
- Feb 24, 2026 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · house
- Feb 24, 2026 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269) · house
- Feb 24, 2026 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269)
- Feb 24, 2026 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 189 (Roll no. 73). · house
- Feb 24, 2026 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2277-2279) · house
- Feb 24, 2026 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1075, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. · house
- Feb 24, 2026 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1075. · house
- Feb 24, 2026 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2269-2276) · house
- Feb 24, 2026 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62. · house
- Feb 24, 2026 The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit for each bill. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each bill. · house
- Feb 24, 2026 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith. · house
How your representatives voted
Sign in to see how your own representatives voted on HRES 1075.
Roll-call votes (2)
How the chamber voted on this bill — the outcome, the tally by party, and every member's recorded position. A factual record.
- On Agreeing to the ResolutionPassed
208 Yea · 187 Nay · 37 Not voting
- Republicans34Yea0Nay3NV
- Democrats0Yea23Nay6NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 66 of 432 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (66)
Yea(34)
- August Pfluger
- Beth Van Duyne
- Brandon Gill
- Brian Babin
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick
- Chip Roy
- Christopher H. Smith
- Craig A. Goldman
- Dan Crenshaw
- Daniel Meuser
- Glenn Thompson
- Jake Ellzey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- John Joyce
- John R. Carter
- Keith Self
- Lance Gooden
- Lloyd Smucker
- Michael Cloud
- Michael T. Mccaul
- Mike Kelly
- Monica De La Cruz
- Morgan Luttrell
- Nathaniel Moran
- Pat Fallon
- Pete Sessions
- Randy K. Sr. Weber
- Robert P. Bresnahan
- Roger Williams
- Ronny Jackson
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Scott Perry
- Thomas H. Kean
- Troy E. Nehls
Nay(23)
- Al Green
- Becca Balint
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Donald Norcross
- Frank Pallone
- Greg Casar
- Henry Cuellar
- Joaquin Castro
- Josh Gottheimer
- Lamonica Mciver
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Madeleine Dean
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Nellie Pou
- Robert Menendez
- Summer L. Lee
- Sylvia R. Garcia
- Veronica Escobar
- Vicente Gonzalez
- On Ordering the Previous QuestionPassed
208 Yea · 189 Nay · 35 Not voting
- Republicans35Yea0Nay2NV
- Democrats0Yea23Nay6NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 66 of 432 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (66)
Yea(35)
- August Pfluger
- Beth Van Duyne
- Brandon Gill
- Brian Babin
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick
- Chip Roy
- Christopher H. Smith
- Craig A. Goldman
- Dan Crenshaw
- Daniel Meuser
- Glenn Thompson
- Jake Ellzey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Jodey C. Arrington
- John Joyce
- John R. Carter
- Keith Self
- Lance Gooden
- Lloyd Smucker
- Michael Cloud
- Michael T. Mccaul
- Mike Kelly
- Monica De La Cruz
- Morgan Luttrell
- Nathaniel Moran
- Pat Fallon
- Pete Sessions
- Randy K. Sr. Weber
- Robert P. Bresnahan
- Roger Williams
- Ronny Jackson
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Scott Perry
- Thomas H. Kean
- Troy E. Nehls
Nay(23)
- Al Green
- Becca Balint
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Donald Norcross
- Frank Pallone
- Greg Casar
- Henry Cuellar
- Joaquin Castro
- Josh Gottheimer
- Lamonica Mciver
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Madeleine Dean
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Nellie Pou
- Robert Menendez
- Summer L. Lee
- Sylvia R. Garcia
- Veronica Escobar
- Vicente Gonzalez
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 24, 2026
Mr. Griffith, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
RESOLUTION
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 119-20 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. Sec. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. House Calendar No. 62
119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1075
[Report No. 119-515]
RESOLUTION
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
February 24, 2026
Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
Comments