Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 9098
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Congressional Records Protection Act

To protect the separation of powers enshrined in the United States Constitution and end the weaponized surveillance of Members of Congress.

Introduced Jun 2, 2026

Latest action (Jul 15, 2026) Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 1.

Issues
Criminal Justice

Summary

  • Prohibits government entities from obtaining search warrants, grand jury subpoenas, court orders, or administrative orders for records of Members of Congress or congressional employees
  • Creates exceptions that allow such legal process if the Member or employee is the target of a criminal investigation, or if a third party's records are sought that pertain to a Member or employee who is a criminal investigation target
  • Requires that if a Member or employee is a criminal investigation target, the government must certify to a magistrate judge that probable cause exists before seeking their records
  • Requires government entities to notify Members or employees prior to or concurrently with execution of legal process seeking their records
  • Prohibits government review of obtained congressional records for 30 days after notification to allow the Member or employee to challenge the legal process
  • Allows delay of notification for up to 10 days in certain circumstances such as endangered life, flight risk, destruction of evidence, or witness intimidation

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Mike Kelly’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $43,700
  • THE PARKER FOUNDATION $13,200
  • LINDY PAVING INC. $8,800
  • GREATER PITTSBURGH AUTO DEALERS ASSOCI $8,300
  • ANDERSON COACH & TRAVEL $8,300

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Mike Kelly → · Outside spending →

Actions (4)

  1. Jul 15, 2026 Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 1. · house
  2. Jul 15, 2026 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
  3. Jun 2, 2026 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
  4. Jun 2, 2026 Introduced in House

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Committee action

What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.

Meetings where this bill was on the agenda

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 2, 2026

Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Gooden, Mr. Hunt, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Fry, Mr. Onder, and Mr. Jordan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To protect the separation of powers enshrined in the United States Constitution and end the weaponized surveillance of Members of Congress.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Congressional Records Protection Act”.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON OBTAINING RECORDS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

(a) In General.—Title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“CHAPTER 239—CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS

“Sec. 3773. Prohibition on obtaining records for Members of Congress or congressional employees

“(a) Prohibition on Obtaining Records.—

“(1) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, a governmental entity may not—

“(A) seek or obtain a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, or subpoena that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material; or

“(B) issue an administrative order that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material.

“(2) Exception.—This subsection shall not apply if the subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order is—

“(A) the target of a criminal investigation; or

“(B) a third party and the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order demands records, information, or the content of communications pertaining to a Member of Congress or congressional employee who is the target of a criminal investigation.

“(b) Notification Requirement.—

“(1) Notice.—

“(A) In general.—A governmental entity shall notify the Member of Congress or congressional employee—

“(i) prior to or concurrently with the execution of a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material; or

“(ii) as soon as practicable following the execution of a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena that unexpectedly returns covered material.

“(B) Exception.—If a subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order is the target of a criminal investigation or if the subject is a third party and the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order demands records, information, or the content of communications pertaining to a Member of Congress or congressional employee who is the target of a criminal investigation, a court may, upon application by the governmental entity, issue an order delaying the notice required under subparagraph (A)(i) with respect to an acquisition, subpoena, search, accessing, or disclosure that could reasonably be expected to return covered material in connection with such investigation for a period of not more than 10 days if the court determines that there is reason to believe that providing notice would—

“(i) endanger the life or physical safety of any person;

“(ii) result in flight from prosecution;

“(iii) result in destruction of or tampering with evidence;

“(iv) result in intimidation of potential witnesses; or

“(v) otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay a trial.

“(2) Delayed review.—

“(A) In general.—The governmental entity may not review materials that are reasonably expected to contain covered material until the date that is 30 days after the date notice is made pursuant to paragraph

(1)(A)(i).

“(B) Unexpected return of covered materials.—In instances where a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena unexpectedly returns covered material, the governmental entity shall halt review of the returned material upon the discovery of the covered material until the date that is 30 days after the date notice is made pursuant to paragraph

(1)(A)(ii).

“(C) Exception.—Subparagraphs (b)(2)(A) and

(b)(2)(B) shall not apply when a 30-day delay in reviewing materials could cause an imminent risk to life or serious bodily injury.

“(c) Rule of Construction.—This section may not be construed to limit the scope of any protection applicable under article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States.

“(d) Definitions.—In this section:

“(1) Congressional employee.—The term ‘congressional employee’ has the meaning given that term in subparagraphs (1),

(2), (3), and (5) of section 2107 of title 5 and includes current and former congressional employees.

“(2) Covered material.—The term ‘covered material’ means—

“(A) records, including all written materials, wire communications, and electronic communications, that were prepared by, shared with, or otherwise obtained by a Member of Congress or congressional employee in the course of their official duties, including electronic devices containing such records; and

“(B) records from an electronic or wire communication service related to any accounts of Members and from the time period of their service in Congress or official congressional accounts of congressional employees, or related to any communications between a Member of Congress or congressional employee and other Members of Congress, other congressional employees, or executive branch employees while at least one party to the communication was serving or working in Congress and another party to the communication was serving or working in Congress or the executive branch.

“(3) Wire communication; electronic communication.—The terms ‘wire communication,’ ‘electronic communication,’ and ‘electronic communication service’ have the meanings given those terms in section 2510.

“(4) Governmental entity.—The term ‘governmental entity’ means a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof.

“(5) Member of congress.—The term ‘Member of Congress’ means a current or former Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the United States Congress.

“(6) Executive branch employee.—The term ‘executive branch employee’ has the meaning given that term in subparagraph (2)(A) of section 78u1(h) of title 15 and includes current and former executive branch employees.

“(7) Subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order.—The term ‘subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order’ means the person whose records are sought by the governmental entity, or, if records are sought from an electronic or wire communication service, the person to whom the sought records pertain.

“(8) Target of a criminal investigation.—The term ‘target of a criminal investigation’ means a person whom a governmental entity has probable cause to believe has committed a crime. If the person is a Member of Congress or a congressional employee, then the governmental entity shall submit an application certifying to a magistrate judge with authority in the district—or if there is none reasonably available, a judge of a court of record in the district—that there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a crime. The judge must certify that the application establishes that probable cause exists prior to or concurrently with the governmental entity seeking, obtaining, or issuing a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order for covered material.

“(9) Third party.—The term ‘third party’ means any person who is not a Member of Congress or congressional employee.”.

(b) Clerical Amendment.—The table of chapters at the beginning of part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 238 the following new item:

“239. Congressional Records 3773”. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…