HR 7491 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act
To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person's attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill requires the Bureau of Prisons to create or modify electronic communication systems within 180 days to protect privileged attorney-client communications from monitoring. Under the bill, incarcerated people's electronic communications with their lawyers or legal representatives cannot be monitored by the government, though the communications may be retained until the person's release. Law enforcement can only access retained communications if they obtain a warrant approved by a U.S. Attorney or Assistant Attorney General, and a U.S. Attorney must review the contents beforehand to ensure attorney-client privileged communications are protected. The U.S. Attorney who reviews the contents is then barred from participating in any legal proceedings involving that incarcerated person. The bill applies attorney-client privilege protections to these electronic communications and allows courts to suppress evidence obtained through unauthorized access.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
3 cosponsors
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Madeleine Dean’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- APOLLO GLOBAL $16,500
- KBRA $13,000
- LINDY COMMUNITIES $8,600
- DIVERSIFIED SEARCH $6,940
- LINDY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $6,800
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Madeleine Dean → · Outside spending →
Actions (2)
- Feb 11, 2026 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
- Feb 11, 2026 Introduced in House
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 11, 2026
Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. Jeffries, Ms. Lee of Florida, and Mr. Bacon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person’s attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act”.
SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN AN INCARCERATED PERSON AND THE PERSON’S ATTORNEY.
(a) Prohibition on Monitoring.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall create a program or system, or modify any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives an electronic communication, to exclude from monitoring the contents of any privileged electronic communication. In the case that the Attorney General creates a program or system in accordance with this subsection, the Attorney General shall, upon implementing such system, discontinue using any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act through which an incarcerated person sends or receives a privileged electronic communication, except that any program or system that exists on such date may continue to be used for any other electronic communication.
(b) Retention of Contents.—A program or system or a modification to a program or system under subsection (a) may allow for retention by the Bureau of Prisons of, and access by an incarcerated person to, the contents of electronic communications, including the contents of privileged electronic communications, of the person until the date on which the person is released from prison.
(c) Attorney-Client Privilege.—Attorney-client privilege, and the protections and limitations associated with such privilege (including the crime fraud exception), applies to electronic communications sent or received through the program or system established or modified under subsection (a).
(d) Accessing Retained Contents.—Contents retained under subsection (b) may only be accessed by a person other than the incarcerated person for whom such contents are retained under the following circumstances:
(1) Attorney general.—The Attorney General may only access retained contents if necessary for the purpose of creating and maintaining the program or system, or any modification to the program or system, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives electronic communications. The Attorney General may not review retained contents that are accessed pursuant to this paragraph.
(2) Investigative and law enforcement officers.—
(A) Warrant.—
(i) In general.—Retained contents may only be accessed by an investigative or law enforcement officer pursuant to a warrant issued by a court pursuant to the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(ii) Approval.—No application for a warrant may be made to a court without the express approval of a United States Attorney or an Assistant Attorney General.
(B) Privileged information.—
(i) Review.—Before retained contents may be accessed pursuant to a warrant obtained under subparagraph (A), such contents shall be reviewed by a United States Attorney to ensure that privileged electronic communications are not accessible.
(ii) Barring participation.—A United States Attorney who reviews retained contents pursuant to clause (i) shall be barred from—
(I) participating in a legal proceeding in which an individual who sent or received an electronic communication from which such contents are retained under subsection (b) is a defendant; or
(II) sharing the retained contents with an attorney who is participating in such a legal proceeding.
(3) Motion to suppress.—In a case in which retained contents have been accessed in violation of this subsection, a court may suppress evidence obtained or derived from access to such contents upon motion of the defendant.
(e) Definitions.—In this Act—
(1) the term “agent of an attorney or legal representative” means any person employed by or contracting with an attorney or legal representative, including law clerks, interns, investigators, paraprofessionals, and administrative staff;
(2) the term “contents” has the meaning given such term in 2510 of title 18, United States Code;
(3) the term “electronic communication” has the meaning given such term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code, and includes the Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System;
(4) the term “monitoring” means accessing the contents of an electronic communication at any time after such communication is sent;
(5) the term “incarcerated person” means any individual in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons or the United States Marshals Service who has been charged with or convicted of an offense against the United States, including such an individual who is imprisoned in a State institution; and
(6) the term “privileged electronic communication” means—
(A) any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and a potential, current, or former attorney or legal representative of such a person; and
(B) any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and the agent of an attorney or legal representative described in subparagraph (A). <all>
Comments