HR 6387 Passed House Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
H. R. 6387 To amend the Clean Air Act to require revisions to regulations governing the review and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk.
Summary
The FIRE Act (Fire Improvement and Reforming Exceptional Events Act) amends the Clean Air Act to revise how the Environmental Protection Agency handles air quality monitoring data influenced by wildfires and wildfire mitigation actions like prescribed burns. The bill expands the definition of "exceptional events" to include prescribed fires and other human activities intended to mitigate wildfire risk, and establishes new procedures for states to petition the EPA to exclude air quality data affected by these events from federal compliance determinations. The EPA must revise its regulations within 18 months of enactment and must conduct regional analysis when multiple states report the same air quality event. The bill requires the EPA to establish and maintain a public website that tracks the status of all petitions submitted for exceptional events and wildfire mitigation actions, updated monthly. Governors can petition to exclude affected air quality data from determinations regarding air quality standards violations, area designations, and state implementation plans.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8] (R-CO)
3 cosponsors
- Rep. Crank, Jeff [R-CO-5] (R-CO)
- Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Gray, Adam [D-CA-13] (D-CA)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Gabe Evans’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION $13,513
- BT CONSTRUCTION $11,600
- STARKEY HEARING TECHNOLOGIES $9,900
- FISHER INVESTMENTS $9,900
- SPIERER WOODWARD $9,900
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Gabe Evans → · Outside spending →
Actions (23)
- Apr 27, 2026 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. · senate
- Apr 22, 2026 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · house
- Apr 22, 2026 On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 198 (Roll no. 136). (text: CR 4/21/2026 H3013) · house
- Apr 22, 2026 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 198 (Roll no. 136). (text: CR 4/21/2026 H3013)
- Apr 22, 2026 On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 206 - 214 (Roll no. 135). · house
- Apr 22, 2026 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3064-3065) · house
- Apr 21, 2026 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 6387, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Dexter demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. · house
- Apr 21, 2026 The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. · house
- Apr 21, 2026 Ms. Dexter moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (CR H3019) · house
- Apr 21, 2026 The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. · house
- Apr 21, 2026 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 6387. · house
- Apr 21, 2026 Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409. · house
- Apr 21, 2026 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1174. (consideration: CR H3013-3019; text: CR H3013) · house
- Apr 15, 2026 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1174 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409. · house
- Apr 9, 2026 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 515. · house
- Apr 9, 2026 Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-595. · house
- Jan 21, 2026 Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 23. · house
- Jan 21, 2026 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
- Dec 10, 2025 Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 10. · house
- Dec 10, 2025 Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
- Dec 3, 2025 Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment. · house
- Dec 3, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. · house
- Dec 3, 2025 Introduced in House
How your representatives voted
Sign in to see how your own representatives voted on HR 6387.
Roll-call votes (2)
How the chamber voted on this bill — the outcome, the tally by party, and every member's recorded position. A factual record.
- On PassagePassed
220 Yea · 198 Nay · 12 Not voting
- Republicans34Yea1Nay2NV
- Democrats2Yea26Nay2NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 67 of 430 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (67)
Yea(36)
- August Pfluger
- Beth Van Duyne
- Brandon Gill
- Brian Babin
- Chip Roy
- Christopher H. Smith
- Craig A. Goldman
- Dan Crenshaw
- Daniel Meuser
- Glenn Thompson
- Guy Reschenthaler
- Henry Cuellar
- Jake Ellzey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Jodey C. Arrington
- John Joyce
- John R. Carter
- Keith Self
- Lance Gooden
- Lloyd Smucker
- Marc A. Veasey
- Michael Cloud
- Michael T. Mccaul
- Mike Kelly
- Morgan Luttrell
- Nathaniel Moran
- Pat Fallon
- Pete Sessions
- Randy K. Sr. Weber
- Robert P. Bresnahan
- Roger Williams
- Ronny Jackson
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Scott Perry
- Troy E. Nehls
- Wesley Hunt
Nay(27)
- Al Green
- Analilia Mejia
- Becca Balint
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christian D. Menefee
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Donald Norcross
- Dwight Evans
- Frank Pallone
- Greg Casar
- Herbert C. Conaway
- Jasmine Crockett
- Joaquin Castro
- Josh Gottheimer
- Julie Johnson
- Lamonica Mciver
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Madeleine Dean
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Nellie Pou
- Robert Menendez
- Summer L. Lee
- Veronica Escobar
- On Motion to RecommitFailed
206 Yea · 214 Nay · 10 Not voting
- Republicans0Yea35Nay2NV
- Democrats29Yea0Nay1NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 67 of 430 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (67)
Yea(29)
- Al Green
- Analilia Mejia
- Becca Balint
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christian D. Menefee
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Donald Norcross
- Dwight Evans
- Frank Pallone
- Greg Casar
- Henry Cuellar
- Herbert C. Conaway
- Jasmine Crockett
- Joaquin Castro
- Josh Gottheimer
- Julie Johnson
- Lamonica Mciver
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Madeleine Dean
- Marc A. Veasey
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Nellie Pou
- Robert Menendez
- Summer L. Lee
- Veronica Escobar
- Vicente Gonzalez
Nay(35)
- August Pfluger
- Beth Van Duyne
- Brandon Gill
- Brian Babin
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick
- Chip Roy
- Christopher H. Smith
- Craig A. Goldman
- Dan Crenshaw
- Daniel Meuser
- Glenn Thompson
- Guy Reschenthaler
- Jake Ellzey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Jodey C. Arrington
- John Joyce
- John R. Carter
- Keith Self
- Lance Gooden
- Lloyd Smucker
- Michael Cloud
- Michael T. Mccaul
- Mike Kelly
- Morgan Luttrell
- Nathaniel Moran
- Pat Fallon
- Pete Sessions
- Randy K. Sr. Weber
- Robert P. Bresnahan
- Roger Williams
- Ronny Jackson
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Scott Perry
- Troy E. Nehls
- Wesley Hunt
Not voting(3)
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Committee action
What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.
Meetings where this bill was on the agenda
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 3, 2025
Mr. Evans of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
April 9, 2026
Additional sponsors: Mr. Gray, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. Crank
April 9, 2026
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To amend the Clean Air Act to require revisions to regulations governing the review and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Fire Improvement and Reforming Exceptional Events Act” or the “FIRE Act”.
SEC. 2. AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA INFLUENCED BY EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS OR ACTIONS TO MITIGATE WILDFIRE RISK.
Section 319(b) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7619(b)) is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “Or Actions To Mitigate Wildfire Risk” after “Events”;
(2) in paragraph (1)—
(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking “Definition of exceptional event” and inserting “Definitions”;
(B) in subparagraph (A), by redesignating clauses
(i) through (iv), as subclauses (I) through (IV), respectively;
(C) by striking “(A)” and all that follows through “an event that—” and inserting the following:
“(A) Exceptional event.—
“(i) In general.—The term ‘exceptional event’ means an event that—”;
(D) by amending subclause (III) of subparagraph
(A)(i), as redesignated, to read as follows:
“(III) is an event that is— “(aa) a natural event; “(bb) caused by a human activity that is intended to mirror the occurrence or reoccurrence of a natural event; or
“(cc) caused by a human activity that is unlikely to recur; and”;
(E) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
“(ii) Exclusions.—In this subsection, the term ‘exceptional event’ does not include—
“(I) ordinarily occurring stagnation of air masses;
“(II) meteorological inversions; or
“(III) air pollution relating to source noncompliance.”; and
(F) by adding at the end the following:
“(B) Action to mitigate wildfire risk.—The term ‘action to mitigate wildfire risk’ means a prescribed fire or similar measure, undertaken in accordance with State approved practices, to reduce the risk and severity of wildfires.”;
(3) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A)—
(i) by striking “March 1, 2006” and inserting “18 months after the date of enactment of the FIRE Act”;
(ii) by inserting “revisions to” before “regulations”; and
(iii) by adding “or actions to mitigate wildfire risk” before the period at the end;
(B) in subparagraph (B)—
(i) by inserting “including proposed revisions to regulations,” after “subparagraph (A),”;
(ii) by inserting “or action to mitigate wildfire risk” after “an exceptional event”; and
(iii) by striking “paragraph (3)” and inserting “this section”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(C) Regional analysis.—When more than one State notifies the Administrator of its intent to submit a petition pursuant to this section for an exceptional event or an action to mitigate wildfire risk for the same air quality event, or, if the Administrator determines such a multistate air quality event has occurred, the Administrator shall conduct regional modeling and analysis sufficient to satisfy the demonstration required for an exceptional event or an action to mitigate wildfire risk petition for such air quality event.
“(D) Transparency.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the FIRE Act, the Administrator shall establish, and thereafter update monthly, a public website describing the status of all petitions submitted pursuant to this section for exceptional events and actions to mitigate wildfire risk.”;
(4) in paragraph (3)(A)—
(A) by redesignating clauses (ii) through (v) as clauses (iii) through (vi), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
“(ii) the principle that actions to mitigate wildfire risk can play an important role in reducing the magnitude and frequency of wildfires;”;
(5) in paragraph (3)(B)—
(A) in clause (i), by inserting “or action to mitigate wildfire risk” before “must be”;
(B) by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:
“(ii) a clear causal relationship must exist, or be reasonably expected to exist, between the measured exceedances of a national ambient air quality standard and the exceptional event or action to mitigate wildfire risk to demonstrate that the exceptional event or action to mitigate wildfire risk caused a specific air pollution concentration at a particular air quality monitoring location;”; and
(C) by amending clause (iv) to read as follows:
“(iv) there are criteria and procedures for the Governor of a State to petition the Administrator to exclude air quality monitoring data that is directly due to exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk from use in determinations by the Administrator with respect to—
“(I) area or source exceedances or violations of the national ambient air quality standards;
“(II) the designation, redesignation, classification, or reclassification of an area;
“(III) the demonstration by a State of attainment of a national ambient air quality standard;
“(IV) attainment determinations;
“(V) attainment date extensions;
“(VI) finding a State implementation plan to be inadequate; or
“(VII) preconstruction demonstrations under section 165(a)(3).”; and
(6) by striking paragraph (4). Union Calendar No. 515
119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 6387
[Report No. 119-595]
A BILL
To amend the Clean Air Act to require revisions to regulations governing the review and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk.
April 9, 2026
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Comments