HR 6245 Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012
To amend chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, to provide for the recovery of computer hardware and software patent litigation costs in cases where the court finds the claimant did not have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding, and for other purposes.
Summary
The Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012 amends patent law to allow courts to award full litigation costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, to the prevailing party in computer hardware and software patent cases when the court determines that the party alleging patent infringement did not have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding. The bill defines "computer hardware patent" as a patent covering computer hardware devices or components, and "software patent" as a patent covering processes that could be implemented in a computer or computer systems programmed to perform such processes. The bill applies to any patent lawsuit filed after enactment and does not affect what types of inventions are eligible to be patented. The provision allows courts to deter patent litigation that lacks a reasonable basis for success by shifting costs to unsuccessful patent claimants.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
3 cosponsors
Actions (3)
- Aug 14, 2012 Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet. · house
- Aug 1, 2012 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
- Aug 1, 2012 Introduced in House
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
August 1, 2012
Mr. DeFazio (for himself and Mr. Chaffetz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, to provide for the recovery of computer hardware and software patent litigation costs in cases where the court finds the claimant did not have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012”.
SEC. 2. RECOVERY OF LITIGATION COSTS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PATENT.
(a) Amendment.—Chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 285 the following new section: “Sec. 285A. Recovery of litigation costs for computer hardware and software patent
“(a) In General.—Notwithstanding section 285, in an action disputing the validity or alleging the infringement of a computer hardware or software patent, upon making a determination that the party alleging the infringement of the patent did not have a reasonable likelihood of succeeding, the court may award the recovery of full costs to the prevailing party, including reasonable attorney’s fees, other than the United States.
“(b) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) Computer.—The term ‘computer’ means an electronic, magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or other high-speed data processing device performing logical, arithmetic, or storage functions, and includes—
“(A) any data storage facility or communications facility directly related to or operating in conjunction with such device; and
“(B) any processor or peripheral, such as a monitor or input device, directly related to or operating in conjunction with such device.
“(2) Computer hardware patent.—The term ‘computer hardware patent’ means a patent that covers computer hardware, including a device or component of such device.
“(3) Software patent.—The term ‘software patent’ means a patent that covers—
“(A) any process that could be implemented in a computer regardless of whether a computer is specifically mentioned in the patent; or
“(B) any computer system that is programmed to perform a process described in subparagraph (A).”.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.—The table of sections for chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 285 the following new item:
“285A. Recovery of litigation costs for computer hardware and software patent.”.
(c) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section, or the amendments made by this section, shall be construed as amending or interpreting categories of patent-eligible subject matter set forth under section 101 of title 35, United States Code.
(d) Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to any action involving the validity or infringement of a computer hardware or software patent (as such terms are defined under section 285A of title 35, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)) for which a complaint is filed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. <all>
Comments