HR 4678

0likesShare

Introduced ↻ Update bill dataRe-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click. Contact your reps Urge the sponsor

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 23, 2025

Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Carson, Mr. Casten, Ms. Chu, Ms. Crockett, Mr. Frost, Mr. Goldman of New York, Ms. Jayapal, Mrs. McIver, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Pressley, Mrs. Ramirez, Ms. Sewell, Ms. Stansbury, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Thanedar, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Ms. Williams of Georgia, and Ms. Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to limit the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s creative or artistic expression against such defendant, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Restoring Artistic Protection Act of 2025” or the “RAP Act of 2025”.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT’S CREATIVE OR ARTISTIC EXPRESSION.

(a) In General.—Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: “Rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression.

“(a) Creative and Artistic Expressions Inadmissible.—Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant’s creative or artistic expression, whether original or derivative, is not admissible against such defendant.

“(b) Exception.—A court may admit evidence described in subsection (a) if the Government, in a hearing conducted outside the hearing of the jury, proves by clear and convincing evidence—

“(1)(A) if the expression is original, that defendant intended a literal meaning, rather than figurative or fictional meaning; or

“(B) if the expression is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the expression as the defendant’s own thought or statement;

“(2)(A) in a criminal case, that the creative expression refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; or

“(B) in a civil case, that the creative expression refers to the specific facts alleged in the complaint;

“(3) that the expression is relevant to an issue of fact that is disputed; and

“(4) that the expression has distinct probative value not provided by other admissible evidence.

“(c) Ruling on the Record.—In any hearing under subsection (b), the court shall make its ruling on the record, and shall include its findings of fact essential to its ruling.

“(d) Redaction and Limiting Instructions.—If the court admits any evidence described in subsection (a) pursuant to the exception under subsection (b), the court shall—

“(1) ensure that the expression is redacted in a manner to limit the evidence presented to the jury to that which is specifically excepted under subsection (b); and

“(2) provide appropriate limiting instructions to the jury.

“(e) Definition.—In this section, the term ‘creative or artistic expression’ means the expression or application of creativity or imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds, words, movements or symbols, including music, dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature, film, and other such objects or media.”.

(b) Clerical Amendment.—The table of contents for the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by inserting after the item relating to rule 415 the following:

“416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression.”. <all>