HR 4278 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
Protect U.S. Companies from Foreign Regulatory Taxation Act
To improve protections with respect to foreign regulation for certain entities integral to the national interests of the United States, and for other purposes.
Summary
This bill prohibits U.S. courts from recognizing or enforcing foreign court judgments against major U.S. technology companies that relate to foreign digital market regulations. It authorizes the President to take action to protect such entities from adverse rulings by foreign governments on digital regulations. The bill defines foreign digital market regulations to include requirements for interoperability, data disclosure, data portability, and similar requirements, specifically referencing the European Union's Digital Markets Act. The protections apply to U.S. entities that provide platform services, do business with the Federal Government, or are determined by the President to be integral to U.S. national interests.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
Actions (2)
- Jul 2, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
- Jul 2, 2025 Introduced in House
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 2, 2025
Mr. Fitzgerald introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To improve protections with respect to foreign regulation for certain entities integral to the national interests of the United States, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Protect U.S. Companies from Foreign Regulatory Taxation Act”.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The ability of citizens of the United States to engage in international commerce is a fundamental policy concern of the United States.
(2) Entities in the digital sector contribute significantly to the prosperity of the United States and the growth of the world economy.
(3) The United States has a strategic advantage in the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence and other critical and emerging technologies.
(4) Investments in digital infrastructure and innovation by the United States are a critical extension of the influence and leadership of the United States abroad.
(5) Digital innovation in the United States drives economic growth, streamlines government efficiency, and promotes job creation.
(6) The national security of the United States is strengthened when United States technology is the backbone of the digital services of the world.
(7) United States leadership with respect to technology is under threat due to the proliferation of foreign regulations that target companies from the United States and seek to make United States digital services less competitive.
(8) Restrictions, particularly restrictions adopted unilaterally by foreign countries, that are substantially different from restrictions applied by the United States and that unreasonably hinder the ability of entities integral to the national interests of the United States to pursue commercial activities can have serious adverse effects on employment, economic stability, scientific progress, and international trade, with the potential to impede domestic and foreign policy goals.
(9) The United States has an essential security interest in protecting the safety of the citizens of the United States, securing supply chains for strategically significant industries and infrastructure, and ensuring that industrial sectors related to national security are protected from the influence and control of malign foreign entities.
SEC. 3. PROTECTIONS WITH RESPECT TO FOREIGN REGULATION.
(a) Prohibition.—No judgment against an entity integral to the national interests of the United States by a court or agency of a foreign government with respect to a foreign digital market regulation may be recognized or enforced by any Federal or State court or agency unless otherwise provided for in an Act of Congress.
(b) Actions by President.—
(1) In general.—The President is authorized to take any action the President determines is in the public interest to protect an entity integral to the national interests of the United States from an adverse action by a court or agency of a foreign government with respect to a foreign digital market regulation.
(2) Determination of public interest.—In determining under paragraph (1) whether an action is in the public interest, the President shall consider the impact of the relevant adverse action on—
(A) consumers and businesses in the United States;
(B) the economic and technological security of the United States; and
(C) the foreign relations of the United States, including existing international commitments.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Core platform service.—The term “core platform service” has the meaning given such term in article 2 of chapter I of the Digital Markets Act.
(2) Digital markets act.—The term “Digital Markets Act” means—
(A) regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act); and
(B) any successor to such regulation.
(3) End-user.—The term “end-user” has the meaning given such term in section 301 of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (22 U.S.C. 8541).
(4) Entity integral to the national interests of the united states.—The term “entity integral to the national interests of the United States” means any entity—
(A) that—
(i) does business with the Federal Government, including through Federal contract awards or leases;
(ii) is organized under the laws of a State;
(iii) provides a core platform service; and
(iv) is required to comply with requirements under a foreign digital market regulation; or
(B) that the President otherwise determines is integral to the national interests of the United States.
(5) Foreign digital market regulation.—
(A) In general.—The term “foreign digital market regulation” means any law, regulation, or other legal instrument adopted by a foreign government that requires an entity to—
(i) provide interoperability with respect to any operating systems of such entity;
(ii) disclose information protected under the laws of the United States, including with respect to intellectual property rights, proprietary algorithms, or trade secret protections;
(iii) restrict the use of personal data lawfully collected under the laws of the United States, including if collected for the purpose of providing online advertising services;
(iv) provide sensitive data to third parties, including ranking, query, click, and view data related to free and paid searches generated by end-users or any other customer data;
(v) promote rival entities by prohibiting the entity from giving more favorable treatment to the services and products of the entity as compared to equivalent services and products offered by rival entities;
(vi) ensure that rival entities are permitted to communicate with users, promote offers, and conclude contracts through channels other than channels controlled by the entity, including in relation to users acquired via the services of the entity;
(vii) provide for data portability, limit marketing, or limit competitive pricing measures; or
(viii) cease ordinary business operations without a finding of fault or a demonstration of immediate and irreparable harm by an authorized adjudicatory body.
(B) Exception.—The term “foreign digital market regulation” does not apply to any law, regulation, or other legal instrument that is substantively similar to a law, regulation, or other legal instrument established by an Act of Congress.
(C) Inclusion.—The term “foreign digital market regulation” includes the Digital Markets Act.
(6) State.—The term “State” means each State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and each territory or possession of the United States. <all>
Comments