HR 3732 Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To provide protections for good faith donations of pet food and supplies.
Summary
This bill protects people, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies from legal liability when they donate pet food and supplies that are otherwise fit for consumption or use but may not be readily marketable due to appearance, age, or other cosmetic issues. The liability protection does not apply if the donated products cause injury or death due to the donor's gross negligence or intentional misconduct. The bill also protects donors of substandard pet products from liability if they inform the receiving organization of the defective condition and the organization agrees to recondition the items before distribution to animals. The law is designed to encourage donations of surplus pet food and supplies while maintaining health and safety standards.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
- Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8] (D-MD)
16 cosponsors
- Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-10] (D-CA)
- Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6] (D-MI)
- Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3] (D-MD)
- Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1] (R-PA)
- Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6] (D-PA)
- Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40] (R-CA)
- Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13] (R-FL)
- Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11] (R-NY)
- Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6] (D-GA)
- Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] (D-WI)
- Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2] (R-KS)
- Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-MI-3] (D-MI)
- Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6] (R-IN)
- Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24] (R-NY)
- Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] (D-NV)
- Rep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2] (R-NJ)
Money behind the sponsor
Top reported contributors to Jamie Raskin’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.
- NULL $54,700
- AMERICAN UNIVERSITY $20,773
- GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY $10,775
- NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY $7,100
- ORIOLES $6,600
Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Jamie Raskin → · Outside spending →
Actions (2)
- Jun 4, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
- Jun 4, 2025 Introduced in House
Similar bills (6)
Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 4, 2025
Mr. Raskin (for himself, Mrs. Kim, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mrs. Dingell, and Ms. Malliotakis) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide protections for good faith donations of pet food and supplies.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Bring Animals Relief and Kibble Act of 2025” or the “BARK Act of 2025”.
SEC. 2. LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES FROM GOOD FAITH DONATIONS OF PET FOOD AND SUPPLIES.
(a) In General.—
(1) Liability of persons.—A person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of an apparently fit pet-related product that the person donates in good faith to a State or unit of local government or a nonprofit organization for ultimate distribution to qualified animals.
(2) Liability of nonprofit organizations.—A nonprofit organization shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of an apparently fit pet-related product that the nonprofit organization received as a donation from a person in good faith for ultimate distribution to qualified animals.
(3) Liability of state and local governments.—A State or unit of local government shall not be subject to liability arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of an apparently fit pet-related product that the State or unit of local government received as a donation from a person in good faith for ultimate distribution to qualified animals.
(4) Waiver not applicable to gross negligence or intentional misconduct.—Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) shall not apply to an injury to, or death of, an ultimate user or recipient of the apparently fit pet-related product that results from an act or omission of the person, nonprofit organization, or State or unit of local government, as applicable, constituting gross negligence or intentional misconduct.
(b) Partial Compliance.—If a person donates in good faith pet food or pet supplies that do not meet all quality and labeling standards imposed by Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, such person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability in accordance with this section if the State or unit of local government or nonprofit organization to which the food or supplies are donated—
(1) is informed by such person of the distressed or defective condition of the food or supplies;
(2) agrees to recondition such food or supplies to comply with such quality and labeling standards prior to distribution of such food or supplies; and
(3) is knowledgeable of such quality and labeling standards to properly recondition such food or supplies.
(c) Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to—
(1) create any liability; or
(2) supercede State or local health regulations.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) Apparently fit pet-related product.—The term “apparently fit pet-related product” means any pet food or pet supply that meets all quality and labeling standards imposed by Federal, State, and local laws and regulations even though the product may not be readily marketable due to appearance, age, freshness, grade, size, surplus, or other conditions.
(2) Child nutrition act of 1966 terms.—The terms “donate”, “gross negligence”, “intentional misconduct”, “nonprofit organization”, and “person” have the meanings given such terms in section 22(b) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1791(b)).
(3) Emotional support animal.—The term “emotional support animal” means an animal that—
(A) is covered by the exclusion specified in section 5.303 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulation); and
(B) is not a service animal.
(4) Pet.—The term “pet” means a domesticated animal, such as a dog, cat, bird, rodent, fish, turtle, or other animal that is kept for pleasure rather than for commercial purposes.
(5) Pet food.—The term “pet food” means any raw, cooked, processed, or prepared edible substance, ice, beverage, or ingredient used or intended for use in whole or in part for consumption by a qualified animal.
(6) Pet supply.—The term “pet supply” means tangible personal property used for qualified animals, including pet carriers, crates, kennels, houses, cages, clothing, bedding, toys, collars, leashes, leads, tie-outs, feeders, bowls, dishes, pet gates, or pet doors.
(7) Qualified animal.—The term “qualified animal” means a pet, an emotional support animal, or a service animal.
(8) Service animal.—The term “service animal” has the meaning given the term in section 36.104 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulation). <all>
Comments