HR 3706 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and the Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and for other purposes.
Summary
- Requires the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology based on chemical analysis to identify the country of origin of seafood.
- Specifies that the methodology must be portable, minimize processing time, and be able to test prepared seafood such as sushi, sashimi, and ceviche.
- Requires pilot studies on red snapper and tuna as examples of stationary and highly migratory fish stocks.
- Requires submission of a report to Congress within 2 years summarizing the methodology, a plan for implementation, and any impracticalities encountered.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
-
Rep. Babin, Brian (R-TX) [#36]
2 cosponsors
-
Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman (R-AS) [At-large] -
Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon (D-VA) [#7]
Actions (7)
- Feb 11, 2026 Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent. · house
- Feb 11, 2026 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
- Feb 11, 2026 Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Discharged · house
- Jul 22, 2025 Subcommittee Hearings Held · house
- Jul 16, 2025 Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries. · house
- Jun 4, 2025 Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. · house
- Jun 4, 2025 Introduced in House
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 4, 2025
Mr. Babin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To require the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and the Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a standard methodology for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement against illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Standards for Understanding Source and Habitat Identification Act” or the “SUSHI Act”.
SEC. 2. METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFYING THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OF SEAFOOD.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) Administrator.—The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
(2) Appropriate committees of congress.—The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
(B) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives.
(3) Key agency leadership.—The term “key agency leadership” means the Administrator and the Under Secretary, in consultation with the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Commandant of the Coast Guard.
(4) Red snapper.—The term “red snapper” means the species Lutjanus campechanus.
(5) Tuna.—The term “tuna” means the following species of tuna:
(A) Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus).
(B) Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares).
(C) Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus).
(6) Under secretary.—The term “Under Secretary” means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology.
(b) Standard Methodology for Identification.—
(1) In general.—Key agency leadership shall jointly develop a standard methodology, based on chemical analysis, for identifying the country of origin of seafood to support enforcement against unlawful, unreported, and unregulated fishing.
(2) Requirements.—Key agency leadership shall ensure that the methodology developed under this subsection—
(A) is consistent with the needs of Federal and State law enforcement agencies in combating unlawful, unreported, and unregulated fishing;
(B) minimizes processing time;
(C) involves the use of a field kit that can be easily carried by one individual; and
(D) to the extent practicable, can be used to test prepared food, including raw preparations of seafood, such as ceviche, sashimi, sushi, and poke.
(3) Initial species for identification.—In developing the methodology under this subsection, key agency leadership shall conduct pilot studies on red snapper, as an example of a stationary stock, and tuna, as an example of a highly migratory stock.
(c) Report.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes the following:
(1) A summary of the methodology developed under subsection
(b).
(2) A plan for operationalizing such methodology.
(3) If the Under Secretary determines any aspect of such methodology is impractical, an explanation relating thereto, whether additional research would make developing such a methodology practicable, and whether a different approach other than chemical analysis might be practicable. <all>
Comments