Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 3563
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Taiwan PLUS Act

To improve defense cooperation between the United States and Taiwan, and for other purposes.

Introduced May 21, 2025

Latest action (May 13, 2026) Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.

Policy area
Issues
Foreign Policy

Summary

This bill designates Taiwan as a member of the "NATO Plus" community of states for defense cooperation purposes for an initial 5-year period. Under this designation, Taiwan would be treated like other close U.S. allies such as Japan, Australia, South Korea, Israel, and New Zealand for purposes of applying certain arms export control provisions of the Arms Export Control Act. The bill allows the Secretary of State to extend this designation for additional 5-year periods if deemed in the U.S. national security interest, with advance notification to Congress. The effect is to streamline and enhance defense cooperation and military sales with Taiwan through application of the same legal frameworks used for other major U.S. allies.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Scott Perry’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • BRODIE GENERATIONAL CAPITAL PARTNERS $13,200
  • SAULSBURY INDUSTRIES $13,200
  • COMMONWEALTH OF PA $8,350
  • NULL $7,326
  • FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE $7,300

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Scott Perry → · Outside spending →

Actions (4)

  1. May 13, 2026 Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0. · house
  2. May 13, 2026 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
  3. May 21, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. · house
  4. May 21, 2025 Introduced in House

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Text versions (1)

  • Introduced in House · May 21, 2025

Only one text version is on file, so there’s no earlier version to compare against yet.

Committee action

What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 21, 2025

Mr. Perry (for himself and Mr. Tiffany) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To improve defense cooperation between the United States and Taiwan, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Taiwan PLUS Act”.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) Taiwan is the 7th largest trading partner in goods with the United States.

(2) Taiwan is recognized by 12 countries as an independent state, and it is presently treated by the United States as a major non-NATO ally for purposes of the transfer or possible transfer of defense articles or defense services under section 1206 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-228; 22 U.S.C. 2321k note).

(3) The unclassified summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy notably prioritized United States efforts to protect America’s allies and partners, stating that United States defense objectives include “defending allies from military aggression, and bolstering partners against coercion, and fairly sharing responsibilities for common defense”.

(4) The Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96-8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) states that “the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability”.

(5) Consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, the United States Congress has for more than four decades approved numerous defense articles and defense services for Taiwan’s self-defense, including, since 2017, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), F-16 C/D fighter jets, M142 launchers, MK 48 heavyweight torpedoes, Harpoon Coastal Defense Systems, Stinger man-portable air defense systems, M109A6 Paladin howitzers, MS-110 Airborne Reconnaissance Systems, Sniper Advanced Targeting Pods, and Field Information Communications Systems.

(6) Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) data indicates that Taiwan was the United States largest Foreign Military Sales (FMS) customer in fiscal year 2020.

(7) DSCA data also indicates that from fiscal years 1950 through 2020, Taiwan was the United States third-largest Foreign Military Sales customer, tied with Japan.

(8) Since 2010, the Department of State has notified Congress of over $41,000,000,000 in FMS to Taiwan, and over $56,000,000,000 in FMS to Taiwan since 2001.

(9) The Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 (subtitle B of title III of division FF of Public Law 116-260), states, “the United States should conduct regular sales and transfers of defense articles to Taiwan in order to enhance its self-defense capabilities, particularly its efforts to develop and integrate asymmetric capabilities, including undersea warfare and air defense capabilities, into its military forces”.

(10) Subparagraph (A) of section 1260(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-

283) states, “[the United States should continue] supporting acquisition by Taiwan of defense articles and services through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with an emphasis on capabilities that support the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan, including anti-ship, coastal defense, anti-armor, air defense, undersea warfare, advanced command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and resilient command and control capabilities.”.

(11) Subparagraph (B) of section 1260(b)(1) of such Act further states that the United States should continue supporting the development of defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability by “ensuring timely review of an response to response to requests of Taiwan for defense articles and services”.

(12) In its 2019 Recommendations to Congress, the nonpartisan U.S.-China Economic and Security Commission issued the following judgement: “Congress [should] raise the threshold of congressional notification on sales of defense articles and services to Taiwan to the highest tier set to U.S. allies and partners. Congress [should] also terminate any requirement to provide prior notification of maintenance and sustainment of military equipment and capabilities previously sold to Taiwan.”. The Commission repeated this recommendation in its 2024 annual report.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) enhanced support for defense cooperation with Taiwan is critical to the national security of the United States, including through designation of Taiwan as a member of the colloquially titled “NATO Plus” community of states, which presently includes Japan, Australia, the Republic of Korea, Israel, and New Zealand, with respect to consideration by Congress of Foreign Military Sales to Taiwan, as well as all other rights, privileges, and responsibilities afforded to such community of states; and

(2) Taiwan should be so designated as a member of the “NATO Plus” community of states.

SEC. 4. ENHANCED DEFENSE COOPERATION.

(a) In General.—During the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, Taiwan shall be treated as if it were a country listed in the provisions of law described in subsection (b) for purposes of applying and administering such provisions of law.

(b) Provisions of Law Described.—The provisions of law described in this subsection are—

(1) subsections (b)(2), (d)(2)(B), (d)(3)(A)(i), and (d)(5) of section 3 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2753);

(2) subsections (e)(2)(A), (h)(1)(A), and (h)(2) of section 21 of such Act (22 U.S.C. 2761);

(3) the matter following subparagraph (P) of subsection

(b)(1) and subsections (b)(2), (b)(6), (c)(2)(A), (c)(5), and

(d)(2)(A) of section 36 of such Act (22 U.S.C. 2776);

(4) section 62(c)(1) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 2796a(c)(1)); and

(5) section 63(a)(2) of such Act (22 U.S.C. 2796b(a)(2)).

(c) Continued Application.—The Secretary of State is authorized to continue to apply this section with respect to Taiwan for additional 5- year periods beginning after the end of the 5-year period described in subsection (a) if, with respect to each such additional 5-year period, the Secretary—

(1) determines that such continued application is in the national security interests of the United States; and

(2) submits such determination to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate not later than 14 days before the start of such additional 5-year period. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…