Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 3553
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

BRUSH Fires Act

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out a study with respect to the effectiveness of available wildfire mitigation methods in reducing the risk of wildfire and the severity of damages from wildfire in communities within or adjacent to shrubland ecosystems, and for other purposes.

Introduced May 21, 2025

Latest action (Mar 5, 2026) Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

Summary

The bill directs the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service to conduct a study evaluating the effectiveness of wildfire mitigation methods in shrubland ecosystems, including chaparral, sagebrush, and coastal sage scrub. The study must assess various mitigation approaches such as hazardous fuels management, native ecosystem restoration, and prevention of ember ignitions, as well as identify conditions under which different methods are most effective. The study should also identify administrative and budgetary barriers to implementing mitigation and evaluate partnerships between the Forest Service and non-Federal entities. The Forest Service must complete the study within one year and submit a report to Congress within 90 days after completion. The report must identify best practices for land managers and recommend opportunities to improve coordination on wildfire resilience efforts.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Dave Min’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE $43,046
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA $35,030
  • NULL $30,100
  • STATE OF CALIFORNIA $14,731
  • MILLION DOLLAR BABY $13,200

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Dave Min → · Outside spending →

Actions (7)

  1. Mar 5, 2026 Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent. · house
  2. Mar 5, 2026 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
  3. Mar 5, 2026 Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged · house
  4. Feb 10, 2026 Subcommittee Hearings Held · house
  5. Feb 3, 2026 Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands. · house
  6. May 21, 2025 Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. · house
  7. May 21, 2025 Introduced in House

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Text versions (1)

  • Introduced in House · May 21, 2025

Only one text version is on file, so there’s no earlier version to compare against yet.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

May 21, 2025

Mr. Min (for himself, Mrs. Kim, Ms. Brownley, Mr. Levin, Mr. Huffman, Ms. Rivas, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Whitesides, Mr. Harder of California, Ms. Ansari, and Ms. Jacobs) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out a study with respect to the effectiveness of available wildfire mitigation methods in reducing the risk of wildfire and the severity of damages from wildfire in communities within or adjacent to shrubland ecosystems, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Building Resiliency and Understanding of Shrublands to Halt Fires Act” or the “BRUSH Fires Act”.

SEC. 2. SHRUBLAND WILDFIRE MITIGATION STUDY.

(a) Study.—

(1) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct a study to evaluate the effectiveness of wildfire mitigation methods available to the Forest Service as a means of reducing the risk of wildfire in covered ecosystems and the severity of damages from such wildfire in communities within or adjacent to covered ecosystems.

(2) Elements.—In carrying out the study under paragraph

(1), the Secretary shall, with respect to covered ecosystems—

(A) evaluate the effectiveness and longevity of—

(i) hazardous fuels management activities, including fuel modification through the use of strategic fuel breaks; and

(ii) practices for maintaining the health of native ecosystems, including—

(I) mitigating the development and spread of invasive species, including invasive weeds, grasses, and other vegetation; or

(II) improving the resprouting of native shrub species on lands affected by wildfire;

(B) evaluate the effectiveness of policies and protocols of the Forest Service with respect to limiting unintentional ember ignitions attributable to the public or man-made structures, including electrical infrastructure;

(C) study the conditions (including weather, seasonality, and topography) under which each wildfire mitigation method evaluated under the study is most and least effective in reducing the risk of wildland fire;

(D) identify administrative, operational, and budgetary factors that impede the ability of wildland fire managers and wildland firefighters to implement wildfire mitigation methods evaluated under the study; and

(E) evaluate the effectiveness of partnerships between the Forest Service and non-Federal entities in reducing the vulnerability of homes, roadways, and other high-risk structures to ember ignition.

(3) Coordination; consultation.—

(A) Interagency coordination.—In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable and to avoid the duplication of research activities of the Federal Government, act in coordination with—

(i) entities within the Forest Service with expertise in wildfire risk reduction and ecology in covered ecosystems, including the Shrub Sciences Laboratory and the Maintaining Resilient Dryland Ecosystems program; and

(ii) the heads of Federal agencies conducting wildfire mitigation activities or hazardous fuels management activities in covered ecosystems, including the Secretary of the Interior.

(B) Consultation.—In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary may, and is encouraged to, solicit consultation from non-Federal public and private entities with relevant expertise in wildfire mitigation in covered ecosystems, as determined by the Secretary.

(b) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the study under subsection (a)(1) is complete, the Secretary shall submit to the relevant Congressional committees, and make publicly available, a report that includes—

(1) a summary of the results of the study;

(2) based on the results of the study, identification by the Secretary of—

(A) best practices for land managers in reducing the risk of wildfire in covered ecosystems; and

(B) any areas implicated by the study that merit further research;

(3) a comparison of the polices and protocols of the Forest Service with respect to reducing the risk of wildfire in covered ecosystems and the best practices identified under paragraph (2)(A); and

(4) an evaluation by the Secretary of opportunities to improve coordination between the Forest Service and non-Federal entities on activities to improve wildfire resilience in covered ecosystems and reduce risks of harm from wildfire to the built environment, particularly in the wildland-urban interface.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Covered ecosystems.—The term “covered ecosystems” means shrubland ecosystems, including—

(A) chaparral;

(B) coastal sage scrub;

(C) sagebrush;

(D) shrub-steppe;

(E) xeric shrubland; and

(F) any other dryland shrub ecosystem in which wildfire management presents a significant challenge, as determined by the Secretary.

(2) Hazardous fuels management activity.—The term “hazardous fuels management activity” means an activity to manage vegetation to reduce the risk of wildfire.

(3) Relevant congressional committees.—The term “relevant Congressional committees” means—

(A) the committees on Appropriations, Natural Resources, and Agriculture of the House of Representatives; and

(B) the committees on Appropriations, Energy and Mineral Resources, and Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate.

(4) Secretary.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.

(5) Wildland-urban interface.—The term “wildland-urban interface” has the meaning given such term in section 101 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6511). <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…