HR 2189 Passed House Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes.
Summary
The bill modernizes federal firearms laws by creating a new legal category for less-than-lethal projectile devices and exempting them from certain federal regulations and taxes. It defines these devices as non-lethal weapons with projectiles limited to 500 feet per second that cannot accept ammunition commonly used in standard firearms. The legislation exempts qualifying less-than-lethal devices from federal firearms excise taxes and National Firearms Act restrictions, while requiring the Treasury Secretary to review and maintain lists of approved devices and determine whether new devices meet the definition within 90 days of request. This allows law enforcement and others to use and purchase less-than-lethal alternatives without the taxes and regulatory burdens applied to traditional firearms.
AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.
Sponsor (1)
95 cosponsors
- Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5] (R-WA)
- Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] (D-OH)
- Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large] (R-AK)
- Rep. Bergman, Jack [R-MI-1] (R-MI)
- Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2] (D-GA)
- Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4] (R-CO)
- Rep. Boyle, Brendan F. [D-PA-2] (D-PA)
- Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2] (R-TN)
- Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7] (R-MO)
- Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41] (R-CA)
- Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15] (R-OH)
- Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2] (D-LA)
- Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9] (D-NY)
- Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6] (R-VA)
- Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46] (D-CA)
- Rep. Crane, Elijah [R-AZ-2] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Crockett, Jasmine [D-TX-30] (D-TX)
- Rep. Cuellar, Henry [D-TX-28] (D-TX)
- Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1] (D-NC)
- Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11] (R-NC)
- Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8] (R-CO)
- Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4] (R-MS)
- Rep. Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4] (R-TX)
- Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1] (R-MN)
- Rep. Fischbach, Michelle [R-MN-7] (R-MN)
- Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3] (R-TN)
- Rep. Fry, Russell [R-SC-7] (R-SC)
- Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26] (R-TX)
- Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4] (D-NY)
- Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5] (R-TX)
- Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5] (D-NJ)
- Rep. Gray, Adam [D-CA-13] (D-CA)
- Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6] (R-WI)
- Rep. Guest, Michael [R-MS-3] (R-MS)
- Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large] (R-WY)
- Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Harrigan, Pat [R-NC-10] (R-NC)
- Rep. Hern, Kevin [R-OK-1] (R-OK)
- Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3] (R-LA)
- Rep. Hinson, Ashley [R-IA-2] (R-IA)
- Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9] (R-IN)
- Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38] (R-TX)
- Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48] (R-CA)
- Rep. Jackson, Jonathan L. [D-IL-1] (D-IL)
- Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32] (D-TX)
- Rep. Kean, Thomas H. [R-NJ-7] (R-NJ)
- Rep. Kennedy, Mike [R-UT-3] (R-UT)
- Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40] (R-CA)
- Rep. Knott, Brad [R-NC-13] (R-NC)
- Rep. Kustoff, David [R-TN-8] (R-TN)
- Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1] (R-NY)
- Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1] (R-CA)
- Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] (R-NY)
- Rep. Larson, John B. [D-CT-1] (D-CT)
- Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15] (R-FL)
- Rep. Mackenzie, Ryan [R-PA-7] (R-PA)
- Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11] (R-NY)
- Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2] (R-UT)
- Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1] (R-KS)
- Rep. McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6] (R-NC)
- Rep. McGuire, John J. [R-VA-5] (R-VA)
- Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1] (R-WV)
- Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15] (R-IL)
- Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7] (R-OH)
- Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1] (R-IA)
- Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1] (R-AL)
- Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14] (R-NC)
- Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1] (R-TX)
- Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22] (R-TX)
- Rep. Onder, Robert F. [R-MO-3] (R-MO)
- Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3] (D-WA)
- Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5] (R-FL)
- Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2] (R-KS)
- Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-MI-3] (D-MI)
- Rep. Schweikert, David [R-AZ-1] (R-AZ)
- Rep. Simpson, Michael K. [R-ID-2] (R-ID)
- Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8] (R-MN)
- Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17] (R-FL)
- Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11] (D-MI)
- Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3] (R-IN)
- Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24] (R-NY)
- Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13] (D-MI)
- Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2] (D-MS)
- Rep. Tiffany, Thomas P. [R-WI-7] (R-WI)
- Rep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2] (R-NJ)
- Rep. Van Duyne, Beth [R-TX-24] (R-TX)
- Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3] (R-WI)
- Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2] (D-NM)
- Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33] (D-TX)
- Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7] (D-VA)
- Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1] (R-VA)
- Rep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2] (R-IN)
- Rep. Zinke, Ryan K. [R-MT-1] (R-MT)
Actions (17)
- Feb 24, 2026 Received in the Senate. · senate
- Feb 12, 2026 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · house
- Feb 12, 2026 On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191) · house
- Feb 12, 2026 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 233 - 185 (Roll no. 70). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2190-2191)
- Feb 12, 2026 The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. · house
- Feb 12, 2026 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2189. · house
- Feb 12, 2026 Rule provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617, and one motion to commit S. 1383. · house
- Feb 12, 2026 Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1057. (consideration: CR H2190-2204) · house
- Feb 11, 2026 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1057 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of S. 1383, H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617, and one motion to commit S. 1383. · house
- Feb 9, 2026 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1042 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2189, H.R. 261 and H.R. 3617. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2189, H.R. 261, and H.R. 3617 under a closed rule and provides for one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill. · house
- Jan 30, 2026 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 403. · house
- Jan 30, 2026 Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-472. · house
- Nov 20, 2025 Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 8. · house
- Nov 20, 2025 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
- Nov 18, 2025 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held · house
- Mar 18, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
- Mar 18, 2025 Introduced in House
How your representatives voted
Sign in to see how your own representatives voted on HR 2189.
Roll-call votes (1)
How the chamber voted on this bill — the outcome, the tally by party, and every member's recorded position. A factual record.
- On PassagePassed
233 Yea · 185 Nay · 13 Not voting
- Republicans35Yea1Nay1NV
- Democrats5Yea22Nay2NV
The party tally and member list below cover the 66 of 431 positions we've recorded so far; the outcome above is the official chamber result.
See how each member voted (66)
Yea(40)
- August Pfluger
- Beth Van Duyne
- Brandon Gill
- Brendan F. Boyle
- Brian Babin
- Chip Roy
- Christopher H. Smith
- Craig A. Goldman
- Dan Crenshaw
- Daniel Meuser
- Donald Norcross
- Glenn Thompson
- Guy Reschenthaler
- Henry Cuellar
- Jake Ellzey
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Jodey C. Arrington
- John Joyce
- John R. Carter
- Keith Self
- Lance Gooden
- Lloyd Smucker
- Marc A. Veasey
- Michael Cloud
- Michael T. Mccaul
- Mike Kelly
- Monica De La Cruz
- Morgan Luttrell
- Nathaniel Moran
- Pat Fallon
- Pete Sessions
- Randy K. Sr. Weber
- Robert P. Bresnahan
- Roger Williams
- Ronny Jackson
- Ryan Mackenzie
- Scott Perry
- Thomas H. Kean
- Troy E. Nehls
- Vicente Gonzalez
Nay(23)
- Al Green
- Becca Balint
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christian D. Menefee
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Dwight Evans
- Frank Pallone
- Greg Casar
- Herbert C. Conaway
- Jasmine Crockett
- Julie Johnson
- Lamonica Mciver
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Madeleine Dean
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Nellie Pou
- Robert Menendez
- Summer L. Lee
- Sylvia R. Garcia
- Veronica Escobar
Not voting(3)
More bills on these subjects (8)
Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).
Text versions (3)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Committee action
What happened to this bill in committee — the meetings where it was considered and every recorded vote taken on it.
Meetings where this bill was on the agenda
Full text
AN ACT
To modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
TITLE I—LAW-ENFORCEMENT INNOVATE TO DE-ESCALATE
SECTION 101. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the “Law-Enforcement Innovate to De- Escalate Act”.
SEC. 102. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN LESS-THAN-LETHAL PROJECTILE DEVICES FROM RESTRICTIONS UNDER TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.
Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the second sentence of paragraph (3), by inserting “or a less-than-lethal projectile device” before the period; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(39)(A) The term ‘less-than-lethal projectile device’ means a device that—
“(i) is not designed or intended to expel and may not be readily converted to accept and discharge—
“(I) ammunition commonly used in handguns, rifles, or shotguns; or
“(II) any other projectile at a velocity exceeding 500 feet per second;
“(ii) is designed and intended to be used in a manner that is not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury; and
“(iii) does not accept, and is not able to be readily modified to accept, an ammunition feeding device—
“(I) loaded through the inside of a pistol grip; or
“(II) commonly used in semiautomatic firearms.
“(B) If a person requests that the Attorney General determine whether a device satisfies the definition of ‘less-than-lethal projectile device’ under subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall make the determination not later than 90 days after the date on which the Attorney General receives the device pursuant to the request.”.
TITLE II—INNOVATE LESS LETHAL TO DE-ESCALATE TAX MODERNIZATION
SEC. 201. SHORT TITLE.
This title may be cited as the “Innovate Less Lethal to De- Escalate Tax Modernization Act”.
SEC. 202. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN LESS-THAN-LETHAL PROJECTILE DEVICES FROM FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION TAX.
(a) In General.—Section 4182 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e), and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection:
“(d) Less-than-Lethal Projectile Devices.—
“(1) In general.—The tax imposed by section 4181 shall not apply to—
“(A) any less-than-lethal projectile device,
“(B) any device contained on the most recent list made available by the Secretary under paragraph (4)(B), and
“(C) any shell or cartridge that meets the requirement of paragraph (2)(B) and is designed for use in a device referred to in subparagraph (A) or (B).
“(2) Less-than-lethal projectile device.—The term ‘less- than-lethal projectile device’ means a device that—
“(A) is not designed or intended to expel, and may not be readily converted to accept and discharge—
“(i) ammunition commonly used in handguns, rifles, or shotguns, or
“(ii) any other projectile at a velocity exceeding 500 feet per second,
“(B) is designed and intended to be used in a manner that is not likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, and
“(C) does not accept, and is not able to be readily modified to accept, ammunition feeding devices—
“(i) loaded through the inside of a pistol grip, or
“(ii) commonly used in semiautomatic firearms.
“(3) Request for classification.—Pursuant to a request made by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of a device for a determination as to whether such device satisfies the requirements under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall make such determination not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of such request.
“(4) Annual review of new and emerging technologies.—
“(A) List of less-than-lethal projectile devices.—The Secretary shall make publicly available a list of devices that the Secretary has determined are described in paragraph (2) and shall update such list annually to take into account new devices.
“(B) List of non-lethal devices the projectiles of which exceed 500 feet per second.—
“(i) In general.—The Secretary shall—
“(I) make publicly available a list of devices that the Secretary has determined are not described in paragraph (2) but would be so described if such paragraph were applied without regard to subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof, and
“(II) update such list annually to take into account new devices.
“(ii) Report to congress.—The Secretary shall annually submit a written report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate regarding the annual list of devices described in clause (i), including a copy of such list, a description of the devices that were considered for inclusion on such list, and the reasons for including or excluding such devices from such list.”.
(b) Effective Date.—
(1) In general.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the amendments made by this section shall apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Requests for determinations.—Section 4182(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section) shall apply to requests received after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that any request under such section which is received during the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be treated for purposes of such section as received as of the close of such period.
SEC. 203. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN LESS-THAN-LETHAL PROJECTILE DEVICES FROM NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT.
Section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking “an antique firearm or” and inserting “any antique firearm, any less-than-lethal projectile device (as defined in section 4182(d)(2)), any device referred to in section 4182(d)(1)(B), or”.
Passed the House of Representatives February 12, 2026.
Attest:
Clerk. 119th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 2189
AN ACT
To modernize Federal firearms laws to account for advancements in technology and less-than-lethal weapons, and for other purposes.
Comments