Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 1500
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Building Native Habitats at Federal Facilities Act

To require the priority and consideration of using native plants in Federal projects, and for other purposes.

Introduced Feb 21, 2025

Latest action (Feb 21, 2025) Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Summary

This bill requires federal agencies to prioritize the use of native plants over non-native plants in federal construction and landscaping projects, considering factors like cost, schedule, and environmental benefits such as habitat creation and erosion control. Federal contracts for such projects must include these requirements for the contractor and any subcontractors. The Council on Environmental Quality must provide guidance on implementing these requirements and publish biennial reports on federal use of native plants, including case studies and environmental impacts.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Actions (2)

  1. Feb 21, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. · house
  2. Feb 21, 2025 Introduced in House

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Text versions (1)

  • Introduced in House · Feb 21, 2025

Only one text version is on file, so there’s no earlier version to compare against yet.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 21, 2025

Ms. Sherrill (for herself and Mr. Joyce of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

A BILL

To require the priority and consideration of using native plants in Federal projects, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Building Native Habitats at Federal Facilities Act”.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY AND CONSIDERATION OF THE USE OF NATIVE PLANTS IN FEDERAL PROJECTS.

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Federal agency.—The term “Federal agency” has the meaning given the term “Executive agency” in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.

(2) Federal project.—The term “Federal project” means a construction or maintenance activity that—

(A) is carried out—

(i) by a Federal agency; and

(ii) at a Federal facility (as defined in section 930(g) of title 18, United States Code);

(B) involves landscape planting improvements; and

(C) is located in a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or a commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(3) Native plant.—The term “native plant” has the meaning given the term “native plant species” in section 101(a) of title I of division DD of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (43 U.S.C. 1732 note; Public Law 117-

328).

(b) Federal Project Requirements.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, any Federal agency that carries out a Federal project shall—

(A) prioritize, as feasible with respect to cost, schedule, and product supply or a scientific, historical, or educational purpose, the use of native plants over non-native plants; and

(B) consider the benefits, such as habitat creation, supporting native pollinators, providing food and shelter to insect and wildlife populations, decreasing soil erosion and landscape water usage, increasing sediment control, and controlling stormwater runoff, of using native plants over the life of the Federal project when deciding whether to use native plants.

(2) Turfgrass and lawns.—A Federal agency—

(A) is not required to prioritize and consider turfgrass and lawn plantings as required by paragraph

(1); but

(B) is encouraged to consider, with respect to cost, schedule, product supply, overall maintenance requirements, and property usage, the planting of native plants on appropriate areas of existing or planned turfgrass and lawns, particularly unused areas, while carrying out a Federal project.

(c) Contractor Requirements.—In entering into a Federal contract, the head of a Federal agency shall—

(1) include the priority and consideration requirements described in subsection (b) in the contract, to the maximum extent practicable; and

(2) require that any subcontract (at any tier) of that contract include those priority and consideration requirements.

(d) Update to Agency-Specific Design Standards.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal agency that maintains agency-specific facility design standards or that has landscape and maintenance development requirements or standards shall update those requirements and standards in accordance with subsections

(b) and (c).

(e) CEQ Guidance.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality shall distribute to Federal agencies guidance on—

(1) the use of native plants in Federal projects; and

(2) implementing the requirements of this section.

(f) Report.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality shall make publicly available on the website of the Council on Environmental Quality a report on the use of native plants in Federal projects for at least the previous 2 years that includes, at a minimum, the following:

(1) Case studies on best practices used in various Federal projects.

(2) A general analysis of scientific or environmental findings relating to selected Federal projects, the types of plants used, and any quantifiable impacts of native plant usage in the Federal projects.

(3) A description of how the Federal Government is promoting native habitats and native plant usage. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…