Skip to main content
CivicGate

HR 1443
Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.

Public Safety Free Speech Act

To ensure the ability of public safety officers to retain their right to free speech on matters related to public safety, working conditions, and other matters.

Introduced Feb 18, 2025

Latest action (Feb 18, 2025) Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Summary

The bill would create a cause of action allowing law enforcement officers, firefighters, and emergency medical services employees to sue their employers for adverse employment actions taken in response to their statements expressing personal opinions on public safety service delivery, compensation, working conditions, employer policies, or political and religious matters. Relief available to prevailing plaintiffs would include actual and compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and costs. The bill excludes from protection statements made while on duty that express intent to commit violence or illegal actions, advocate for discrimination, intentionally disclose confidential or personally identifiable information about individuals, or suggest withholding or diminishing essential services as a form of job action or protest. The bill does not preempt existing civil rights laws or state law protections against deprivation of rights.

AI-generated plain-language summary of the bill text — neutral, and may be imperfect. See the full text below for the exact wording.

Sponsor (1)

Money behind the sponsor

Top reported contributors to Jefferson Van Drew’s campaign committee (2024 cycle) — who funds the bill’s sponsor, not a claim about this bill. Data from FEC.

  • NULL $176,557
  • ENTREPRENEUR $70,972
  • PULSE VASCULAR $9,900
  • ICONA RESORTS $9,900
  • MONZO CATANESE HILLEGASS $9,000

Organizations whose employees gave the most — itemized individual contributions grouped by the donor’s reported employer (FEC Schedule A). Full finance for Jefferson Van Drew → · Outside spending →

Actions (2)

  1. Feb 18, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · house
  2. Feb 18, 2025 Introduced in House

More bills on these subjects (8)

Other bills that carry the most legislative subjects in common with this one (topical discovery — distinct from the procedural related bills above).

Similar bills (6)

Bills with similar text or summary — includes reintroductions across Congresses. Ranked by semantic similarity of the bill text (computed locally); a neutral discovery aid, not a claim the bills are duplicates.

Text versions (1)

  • Introduced in House · Feb 18, 2025

Only one text version is on file, so there’s no earlier version to compare against yet.

Full text

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 18, 2025

Mr. Van Drew (for himself and Mr. Cohen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To ensure the ability of public safety officers to retain their right to free speech on matters related to public safety, working conditions, and other matters.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Public Safety Free Speech Act”.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) Covered employee.—The term “covered employee” means—

(A) a qualified law enforcement officer (as defined in section 926B(c) of title 18, United States Code);

(B) an individual employed by an employer for the purposes of providing fire-fighting services or emergency medical services; or

(C) a Federal firefighter described in section 8331(21) or 8401(14) of title 5, United States Code.

(2) Employer.—The term “employer” means—

(A) a law enforcement agency, fire department, fire district, or emergency medical services agency which employs a covered employee on either a full-time or part-time basis; or

(B) a county, township, village, city, municipality, special district, fire authority, county improvement district, authority, public entity with the authority to spend or receive public funds, or other political subdivisions of a State and includes any entity jointly created by 2 or more public employers.

(3) Personally identifiable information.—The term “personally identifiable information” means information—

(A) that directly identifies an individual, including name, address, social security number or other identifying number or code, telephone number, email address; or

(B) by which an organization is able to identify specific individuals in conjunction with other data elements.

SEC. 3. CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATING THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.

(a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a covered employee may bring an action against an employer if the employer engages in termination or any adverse employment action against the employee for making oral or written statements expressing the employee’s personal opinion on matters pertaining to—

(1) delivery of public safety services;

(2) employee compensation or benefits;

(3) working conditions or scheduling, including the provision of personal protective equipment, work tools and equipment, or work vehicles;

(4) employer’s policies or procedures;

(5) other expectations or requirements that the employer places on a covered employee as a term or condition of their employment; or

(6) political and religious opinions.

(b) Relief.—A plaintiff that prevails in an action under subsection (a) may receive actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, attorneys’ fees and costs, and any other appropriate relief.

(c) Limitations.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to written or oral comments that—

(1) are made while the covered employee is on duty;

(2) express any encouragement of, or intent, to commit violence or other illegal actions;

(3) advocate for discrimination or support favoritism when discharging their professional duties;

(4) intentionally disclose confidential or personally identifiable information pertaining to specific individuals with whom the covered employee has interacted with in the course of performing their work or other job-related duties; or

(5) suggest, advocate for, support, or otherwise communicate that essential services should be withheld, delayed, or diminished as a form of job action or protest. This Act shall not be construed to preempt, preclude, or supersede section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) or any State law that provides a cause of action for deprivation of rights under color of law. <all>

Comments

Comments

Loading comments…