HR 10299 Introduced Re-checks Congress.gov for new actions and updates the bill's status, and fills in any sponsors, committees, or related bills that are missing. It does not re-pull sponsors/cosponsors/committees/related — those rarely change — and it skips all work if nothing has changed upstream, so it's cheap to click.
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 83 East Park Street in Alamo, Tennessee, as the "Kenneth Nolen Davis Post Office".
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 83 East Park Street in Alamo, Tennessee, as the ``Kenneth Nolen Davis Post Office''.
Sponsor (1)
-
Rep. Kustoff, David (R-TN) [#8]
2 cosponsors
-
Rep. Rose, John W. (R-TN) [#6] -
Rep. Van Epps, Matt (R-TN) [#7]
Actions (2)
- Sep 4, 2026 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. · house
- Sep 4, 2026 Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
Bills are re-published as they move (Introduced → Reported → Engrossed → Enrolled …). Each stage below is a separate text; pick two to see what changed. Data from Congress.gov.
Full text
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 4, 2026
Mr. Kustoff (for himself, Mr. Rose, and Mr. Van Epps) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
A BILL
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 83 East Park Street in Alamo, Tennessee, as the “Kenneth Nolen Davis Post Office”.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KENNETH NOLEN DAVIS POST OFFICE.
(a) Designation.—The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 83 East Park Street in Alamo, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the “Kenneth Nolen Davis Post Office”.
(b) References.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the “Kenneth Nolen Davis Post Office”. <all>
Comments